Giants Cut Ties with Third Baseman J.D. Davis, Sparking Controversy
ICARO Media Group
In a surprising move, the San Francisco Giants have placed third baseman J.D. Davis on unconditional release waivers, just weeks before the start of the season. This decision comes after Davis won a $6.9 million salary in an arbitration hearing back in February. However, due to a provision in the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the Giants are only obligated to pay Davis 30 days of termination pay, amounting to a little over $1.1 million.
The Giants' actions have sparked controversy within the baseball industry, with some viewing it as a ruthless and cold-blooded move, while others see it as a pragmatic decision within the rights of teams under the CBA. Regardless, it leaves Davis in a precarious position, without a team and receiving only 16 percent of the salary that an independent panel had determined he was worth.
Giants president of baseball operations, Farhan Zaidi, explained that the team attempted to trade Davis but failed to find any takers. They then placed him on outright waivers, hoping another club would claim him and expedite the process. However, when Davis went unclaimed, the Giants made the decision to release him.
Zaidi defended the team's actions, stating that they were well within their rights as a team and that their negotiations with Davis were conducted in good faith. He also highlighted that Davis' representatives could have accepted the club's offer prior to the deadline for exchanging salary figures. Davis' agent, Matt Hannaford, disputed this claim, stating that the Giants' offer came in just an hour before the deadline and was significantly lower than their filing number.
The release of Davis raises questions about the Giants' motive and whether they intentionally exploited the CBA loophole to avoid guaranteeing his arbitration salary. It also highlights the potential impact of the late-developing nature of free agency on teams' roster decisions.
Davis now becomes a high-profile example of a player losing out on a significant portion of his salary due to this loophole. While it is unlikely that he will be able to file a grievance, his agent remains confident that Davis will find a better situation with another team.
The Giants' decision to release Davis will save them nearly $6 million in payroll obligations, pushing them approximately $13 million below the luxury tax threshold. Nonetheless, the team insists that their reputation among players and free agents will not be tarnished, citing their strong communication and commitment to taking care of their players.
The controversy surrounding Davis' release raises discussions about possible changes to the CBA language in the next negotiation, particularly regarding the guarantee of arbitration salaries. As the baseball season approaches, the aftermath of this contentious move by the Giants will undoubtedly generate further debate and scrutiny within the industry.