Speaker Mike Johnson Pulls GOP Funding Bill Amid Internal Divisions on Voting Measure
ICARO Media Group
In a surprising turn of events, Speaker Mike Johnson has announced the decision to withdraw a short-term government funding bill from the House floor. This move comes in the face of significant defections from the right flank of the GOP, underscoring the deep internal divisions within the House Republican conference.
Speaking to reporters just hours ahead of the scheduled vote, Johnson declared, "No vote today." He cited ongoing conversations within the Republican Conference, stating, "We are having thoughtful conversations, family conversations, and I believe we will get there."
The funding bill at the center of this controversy contained a controversial measure targeting noncitizen voting. Johnson argued for its necessity, saying, "I want any member of Congress in either party to explain to the American people why we should not ensure that only US citizens are voting in US elections... It's the most pressing issue right now, and we're going to get this job done."
However, at least eight House Republicans had already come out against the bill, enough to sink it in the House alongside Democratic opposition. Furthermore, the bill faced strong opposition in the Democratic-controlled Senate and a potential veto from President Biden.
If the GOP funding plan fails to pass in the House, it will be a significant embarrassment for the House Republicans and could lead to a scramble to find alternative solutions before the looming government shutdown deadline at the end of the month. Johnson may need to demonstrate that the bill lacks the necessary votes to justify moving toward a "clean" funding measure that excludes the controversial voting provision, a scenario favored by Democrats to avert a shutdown.
Adding to the speaker's challenges, Johnson now faces additional pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has warned that if Republicans do not receive "absolute assurances" on election security, they should not pass a funding extension. Johnson has attempted to align himself with Trump's demands, but any further insistence from the former president could expose him to criticism from the right flank of his own party.
The funding plan proposed by House Republicans aimed to extend government funding until March 2025. Included in the proposal was the SAVE Act, a bill previously passed by the House that requires documentary proof of US citizenship for federal voter registration, despite it already being illegal for noncitizens to vote in federal elections.
This push for stricter voting measures comes as Trump and his supporters continue to cast doubts on election integrity leading up to the 2024 elections.
In a potentially contentious development, Trump recently stated on social media platform Truth Social, "If Republicans in the House, and Senate, don't get absolute assurances on Election Security, THEY SHOULD, IN NO WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, GO FORWARD WITH A CONTINUING RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET." Johnson responded by emphasizing his agreement with Trump on election security, reiterating the need for funding the government.
Johnson is currently working to salvage the short-term spending plan amidst backlash from fellow Republicans, but has kept the option of passing a "clean" bill open. However, many conservatives within the House have expressed a general opposition to short-term funding bills, advocating for spending cuts instead.
The Department of Veterans Affairs has also raised concerns about the GOP funding plan, warning of potential negative impacts on delivering benefits to veterans. Due to increased enrollment following the passage of the PACT Act, which expanded accessibility to healthcare and other benefits for veterans, the department is facing a significant shortfall. The proposed six-month funding bill into March would further exacerbate this shortfall, potentially affecting the quality of healthcare services, wait times, staffing, outreach efforts, and infrastructure improvements.
The introduction of veterans' health care concerns may provide Democrats an opportunity to reject the six-month funding bill, which includes the controversial voting measure. While most Democrats are opposed to the bill, there were five who previously voted in favor of the voting legislation as a standalone bill earlier this year.
As the debate rages on within the House GOP conference, Speaker Johnson seeks to find common ground and secure the necessary votes for a funding plan that can pass both chambers and avert a government shutdown.