Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance wasted no time in attacking Kamala Harris's approach to crime during a campaign rally held outside the county courthouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Taking the stage about 10 minutes early, Vance used the backdrop of the city's violent protests against police brutality in 2020 to criticize the Democratic candidate's stance on law and order.

Kenosha became a focal point of unrest after a series of protests erupted, resulting in clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement. One incident involved Illinois teenager Kyle Rittenhouse, who fatally shot three protesters during a demonstration. Rittenhouse was later acquitted of homicide and endangerment charges, claiming self-defense. The incident has since become a symbol of gun rights for the GOP.

Vance seized the moment to highlight Harris's perceived leniency on crime. Addressing the crowd, he emphasized that feeling safe is an American birthright and promised that both he and Donald Trump would take action to end sanctuary cities for undocumented individuals. Vance pledged to prioritize the deportation of those with a history of violence, while advocating for the implementation of the death penalty for drug dealers.

In addition to his stance on immigration and crime, Vance called for the appointment of tougher prosecutors and expressed his commitment to ending frivolous lawsuits against police officers. He argued that these proposals were rooted in common sense and necessary for restoring law and order in America.

The rally drew a significant crowd of supporters, who applauded Vance's statements and shared his concerns about public safety. With the upcoming elections approaching, the Republican vice presidential candidate continues to use his campaign events to highlight what he perceives as weaknesses in his opponents' policies.

As the electoral race intensifies, it remains to be seen how Vance's strong stance on issues like crime will resonate with voters. The upcoming debates and ongoing campaigning efforts will undoubtedly shed further light on the differing approaches to law enforcement that will shape the election outcome.