****

Ukraine is set to deploy American-made ATACMS missiles to target military positions in Russia's western Kursk region following President Joe Biden's decision to lift prior restrictions on their use. This move comes after persistent urging from Kyiv and could mark a significant shift in the dynamics of the ongoing conflict.

Multiple U.S. officials confirmed the authorization, which will see the MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System in Ukrainian hands targeting Russian forces bolstered by North Korean troops since August 2023. These troops have been actively engaged in countering Ukrainian advances, with Kyiv's military already employing various Western-supplied armored vehicles.

Since October 2023, Ukraine has utilized ATACMS missiles, particularly their cluster munition and unitary variants, to strike Russian targets within occupied Ukrainian territory. The White House had withheld authorization for attacks within Russia, worried about potential retaliation from Moscow and concerns about the sufficiency of missile stocks.

The approval to utilize the 190-mile-range ATACMS in Kursk carries considerable political weight. President Biden is nearing the end of his term, and incoming President-elect Donald Trump's reservations about maintaining U.S. support for Kyiv raise the possibility of reduced aid in the future.

Experts suggest that while the permission to use ATACMS in Kursk might lead to some battlefield successes, the broader implication lies in the pressure it could put on Moscow during any renewed peace negotiations. The Institute for the Study of War noted that this move, though significant, wouldn't entirely eliminate the sanctuary for Russian forces on their own soil, as numerous military assets remain within ATACMS' reach in other border regions.

Ivan Stupak, a former officer in the Ukrainian Security Service, emphasized that the decision is critical but unlikely to be a game-changer globally. He speculates that the impact will be more localized, potentially eliminating up to 2,000 Russian troops and approximately 150 pieces of heavy equipment, thus hindering Russia's progress in the Kursk region.

Dan Rice, a former adviser to Ukraine’s military leadership and now president of the American University Kyiv, described the White House's decision-making process as cautious and methodical. He pointed out that while the ATACMS' range limits its ability to target deeper Russian infrastructure, longer-range weapons could counter escalating Russian missile and drone assaults more effectively.

A senior U.S. defense official confirmed that Ukraine has yet to deploy ATACMS missiles on Russian soil. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, however, has hinted at the missiles' future use in a recent social media post.

The diplomatic ramifications of this development are substantial. Josep Borrell, the EU's foreign policy chief, expressed hope that European nations might follow the U.S. example. Discussions about relaxing restrictions on using British-French and German-provided long-range missiles are ongoing, a move Ukraine advocates for in order to strengthen its defense.

Russia's response has been predictably severe. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov warned that the U.S. decision represents a new escalation in tensions and increases U.S. involvement in the conflict. Previous comments by President Vladimir Putin indicated that such long-range Western attacks would equate to NATO countries being at war with Russia.

The decision has drawn mixed reactions. While some believe it strengthens the U.S.'s negotiating position, Ukrainian military and political analysts argue that removing all restrictions on Western weaponry would better facilitate Ukraine's defense and press Putin into genuine negotiations. As the conflict continues, actions like these demonstrate the intricate balance of military strategy and diplomatic maneuvering at play.