Ukrainian Attack Damages Key Russian Air Defense System in Crimea, Contradicting Kremlin's Claims
ICARO Media Group
In a significant development, Ukraine has confirmed that its combined air-sea attack against Crimea on Monday successfully targeted and damaged a key Russian air defense system. This contradicts the Kremlin's claims that all incoming missiles were shot down. The attack has escalated tensions between the two nations as conflicting narratives emerge from both sides.
According to Dmitry Peltenchuk, spokesman for Ukraine's naval operations, the strikes targeted Russian air defense systems across a wide area in Crimea. Peltenchuk confirmed that crucial components of the system were damaged but did not provide information on the weapons used or the precise location of the attacks. This is the first official statement from Kyiv on the incident, responding to widespread reports in Ukrainian and Russian media about the attack.
The Russian Defense Ministry initially claimed that its air defense forces in Crimea had successfully intercepted eight Ukrainian Storm Shadow missiles. However, unofficial Russian sources, including the Ukrainian media site Unian, contradicted this official narrative. Unian reported that the attack had indeed damaged an air defense facility near the village of Olenivka. The strikes, which began around 3 a.m., allegedly put the Russian S-300 system out of action, damaged military vehicles, and caused injuries to over 20 service personnel.
While the Ukrainian military has not confirmed the type of missiles used, there are speculations about the involvement of US ATACMS missiles. These precision-guided ballistic missiles were delivered to Ukraine in September and were previously used in attacks against Russian airfields. The ATACMS M39 variant, with a maximum range of 165 km, could have been used in this strike, pushing the missiles to their operational limit. However, there is no public confirmation yet regarding the use of ATACMS in the attack.
Alternatively, Ukrainian long-range missiles such as the domestically-manufactured Hrim or the Soviet-era Tochka-U missiles could have been deployed. However, reports suggest that supplies of these weapons are limited.
This attack has severely hampered Russia's ability to protect its airspace in the western half of the Black Sea. Analysts believe that a previous attack on the same location in August enabled subsequent devastating Ukrainian missile strikes against Sevastopol in September, resulting in the destruction of a Russian navy warship and a missile submarine, rendering military dry docks unusable.
Eyewitness accounts and widespread social media reports from Crimea indicate multiple missiles flying over Sevastopol on Monday, reportedly unintercepted. Witnesses observed at least four heavy explosions near the military port, accompanied by thick black smoke. Russian military aircraft were scrambled from the nearby Belbek airfield in an attempt to counter the Ukrainian attack.
Pro-Kiev military information platform Krym.Realii reported that a Ukrainian missile detonated near the Sevastopol port's machine shops and naval stores warehouses, contradicting official statements by Kremlin-appointed officials that the attack had failed.
Kyiv Post reached out to ATESH, an umbrella group assisting with partisan activities in Crimea, seeking details about possible assistance provided to Ukrainian forces. While ATESH did not disclose ongoing activities, they confirmed continuous intelligence collection on Russian military installations and troops in Crimea, which is then shared with the Ukrainian military.
This escalating conflict between Ukraine and Russia has wider implications for the region and raises concerns in the international community. The situation remains tense as both sides present conflicting narratives and tensions continue to rise.
As of now, no official response or statements have been issued by the Russian government regarding the Ukrainian attack on the key air defense system in Crimea. The international community will closely monitor the developments and evaluate potential ramifications arising from this confrontation.