In a surprising turn of events, French President Emmanuel Macron's immigration bill faced opposition within his own coalition, as almost a quarter of the 251 Members of Parliament abstained or voted against the bill. The bill had undergone significant hardening to gain support from the conservative Les Républicains party, but it seems to have ignited discontent among Macron's troops.

The drama unfolded during 10 days of intense parliamentary sessions, during which Macron's government lost control of the bill and was compelled to concede to mounting requests from conservatives. This loss of control has led to speculations that Macron has lost his ability to govern France following his defeat in the parliamentary elections last year.

The opposition to the immigration bill even led to the resignation of Health Minister Aurélien Rousseau within 24 hours of the vote. Rousseau expressed his inability to explain the bill and left journalists puzzled. His resignation further highlighted the divisions and challenges Macron's government faces in pushing through its legislative agenda.

The National Rally, on the other hand, surprised many by voting in favor of the bill. This unexpected U-turn has not only embarrassed Macron's troops but also raised questions about the president's ability to navigate the complex field of immigration policy.

The revised version of the immigration bill incorporates various measures aimed at curbing illegal migration in France. These measures include the introduction of quotas to limit the number of arrivals and stricter conditions for family residency permits. However, one of the most contentious aspects of the bill is the imposition of a five-year waiting period for legal immigrants who wish to apply for social security benefits, which can be reduced to 30 months if the applicant has a job.

Despite facing criticism and accusations of encouraging the rise of the far right from opponents, Macron remains resolute in his position. He rebuffed doubts about his ability to govern and declared that he is not stopping now, emphasizing that he still has three and a half years ahead of him to complete his work.

Macron defended his approach by stating that addressing the core issues of security and immigration is crucial in order to counter the National Rally's growing popularity. He argued that efficient solutions to migration-related problems are necessary to prevent the far-right party from gaining power.

Macron pointed to his efforts in developing a migration pact with Europe and implementing the immigration bill as important steps that will help combat trafficking networks and facilitate the deportation of those who are illegally present on French soil. He emphasized that such measures signify efficiency in dealing with the migration issue.

As Macron faces opposition within his coalition and criticism from opponents, the future of his immigration bill remains uncertain. The divisions and challenges highlighted by the recent events demonstrate the complexity of navigating immigration policy in France. Only time will tell how Macron's government will maneuver these obstacles and achieve its intended goals.

(Note: The content of this article is based solely on the information provided and does not include any additional information or analysis.)