Clark believes that the team's move to bring Rodgers on board is a misstep, painting it as a "worst-case scenario" for the franchise and its supporters.

Appearing on ESPN's "SportsCenter," Clark didn't mince words about his disapproval. "This is the worst-case scenario for Pittsburgh Steelers fans. It continues to keep you mired in mediocrity," he stated. Despite acknowledging that Rodgers would improve the quarterback room, Clark argued that the team would still fall short of achieving the championship standard that Pittsburgh holds dear. "Will they contend for that championship that Pittsburgh Steelers people, and fans, and organization think is the standard? No, they won't," he asserted. According to Clark, with Rodgers, the Steelers will be "fighting for a wild card spot" and likely "be home week one of the playoffs."

The Steelers announced on Thursday night that Rodgers, 41, has agreed to a one-year deal with the team, pending a physical. This announcement has not swayed Clark's opinion, which he has consistently voiced since April. During an ESPN appearance on "Get Up," Clark expressed his disappointment in the team's handling of the situation, noting that he felt "sick" about it. He stressed that unless General Manager Omar Khan has strong assurances from Rodgers about his commitment, the move remains deeply flawed in his view.

Clark also highlighted the problematic influence of Rodgers on the franchise, suggesting that the Steelers were being "held hostage" by the 10-time Pro Bowler. He pointedly questioned Rodgers' recent performance and achievements, saying, "What has Aaron Rodgers done in the last two years or since leaving Green Bay that says he should be afforded this type of time?"

The former safety’s scathing critique adds a layer of tension to the Steelers' decision, as Rodgers, who played a partial season with the New York Jets after an Achilles injury in 2023, now looks to change his fortunes with Pittsburgh. Fans and analysts will closely watch to see if this high-stakes gamble pays off or validates Clark’s concerns.