Study Reveals Glitch in mRNA Vaccines Leads to Unintended Immune Responses

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/15920646/original/open-uri20231206-17-wfq7r7?1701897382
ICARO Media Group
News
06/12/2023 21h04

A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Cambridge's Medical Research Council (MRC) Toxicology Unit has discovered that more than a quarter of individuals who received mRNA Covid vaccines experienced unintended immune responses caused by a glitch in the way the vaccine was processed by the body. The data shows that while no adverse effects were observed, these vaccines were found to be imperfect, resulting in the production of nonsensical proteins instead of the desired Covid "spike" protein.

mRNA vaccines, such as the ones developed by Moderna and Pfizer, utilize genetically encoded instructions to direct the body to create a specific protein that simulates an infection safely. The development of mRNA-based vaccines has been a slow process due to the body's tendency to identify RNA as a foreign invader. However, in 2023, two scientists were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for their breakthrough in resolving this issue.

These scientists successfully replaced one of the RNA bases, uridine, with a synthetic alternative, enabling the production of proteins without triggering an immune response. This breakthrough has paved the way for the creation of quick, precise, and highly effective vaccines, serving as the foundation for the Covid vaccine response.

The recent study conducted at the University of Cambridge's MRC Toxicology Unit revealed that when this partially synthetic genetic code is read during the administration of the Covid vaccines, the protein-making machinery in the body sometimes struggles with the synthetic uridine analogues. As a result, nonsensical proteins are produced, which the body recognizes as a foreign substance, leading to an immune system response. The study found that approximately 25-30% of individuals experienced this immune response.

It is important to note that this unintended immune response did not impact the efficacy of the Covid vaccines in providing protection against the coronavirus. However, the study suggests that if similar mRNA vaccines were used for other diseases or infections, viable proteins with active functions in the body could potentially be produced, creating potential risks.

The authors of the study emphasize that there is currently no evidence of such risks in the Covid vaccines and state that any trials conducted on other mRNA therapeutics would detect any potential problems at an early stage.

Dr. James Thaventhiran, the senior author of the report, assures that extensive research has proven the safety of mRNA vaccination against Covid-19. He highlights the billions of doses of Moderna and Pfizer vaccines that have been safely administered, saving lives globally.

The researchers have also discovered an easily implementable solution to eliminate the glitch in mRNA vaccines by modifying the code of the mRNA drug to minimize the use of the problematic pseudo-uridine. These findings were shared with the medicines regulator MHRA approximately a year ago, and updated vaccines incorporating the improved form of mRNA are currently being developed for cancer treatments and other therapeutic purposes.

Professor Anne Willis, Director of the MRC Toxicology Unit, expressed excitement over the discovery of a solution to this glitch, stating that it significantly reduces the risks associated with mRNA technology going forward. While the study reveals decoding issues that can cause immune responses, Professor Willis emphasizes the safety and efficacy of Covid vaccines.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on a glitch in mRNA vaccines that contributes to unintended immune responses in a subset of individuals. However, researchers assure the public that the Covid vaccines remain safe and effective. The identification of a solution to minimize this glitch provides significant progress towards enhancing the safety of mRNA technology for future medical advancements.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related