****

In a triumphant victory speech early Wednesday morning, Donald Trump highlighted America’s abundant reserves of oil and natural gas, boasting that the country possesses "more liquid gold" than Saudi Arabia and Russia. His remarks were specifically directed at Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a former environmental lawyer and current presidential candidate, whom Trump advised to "stay away from the liquid gold."

As Trump aims to amplify fossil-fuel production in a potential second term, he'll be facing an unprecedented environmental backdrop. The year 2024 is expected to be the hottest on record. Greenhouse gas emissions soared to their highest levels last year, and scientists warn that the resulting increase in global temperatures will exacerbate extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and other catastrophic climate impacts.

Despite Trump’s skepticism toward the scientific consensus on human-induced climate change, he remains vocal against renewable energy initiatives such as wind turbines and electric vehicles. He has also threatened to retract unspent climate funds. Nevertheless, analysts argue that the nation's transition to cleaner energy sources will persist due to falling technology costs, corporate pressure, and bipartisan state-level support.

Environmental advocates acknowledge the challenges posed by another Trump administration. "There is no denying that another Trump presidency will stall national efforts to tackle the climate crisis and protect the environment, but most U.S. state, local, and private sector leaders are committed to charging ahead," said Dan Lashof, U.S. director of the World Resources Institute.

Conversely, leaders within the clean energy sector remain optimistic. Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, emphasized that wind and solar industries thrived during Trump’s first term, bringing jobs and economic opportunities to rural areas. He stands ready to collaborate with a possible Trump administration to continue this momentum.

However, experts caution that corporate climate initiatives may go underrepresented due to the administration's rhetoric. Rich Lesser, global chair of Boston Consulting Group, warns that leading companies might hesitate to promote their climate efforts, potentially hindering broader industry progress.

Proposals from Trump allies threaten to dismantle federal climate programs and repeal laws supporting emissions reduction and climate resilience. For instance, conservative groups advocate for shutting down the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office, vital for financing innovative energy projects.

There are also concerns about potential political interference in climate science under a second Trump term. Project 2025, a conservative proposal, suggests dismantling key offices within the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which are essential for monitoring pollutants and conducting atmospheric research.

Trump’s approach to international climate agreements, such as his withdrawal from the Paris climate accord during his first term, raises further alarm. Experts stress that U.S. disengagement from global climate efforts could undermine international progress on climate change mitigation and adaptation.

The American Petroleum Institute (API), representing the U.S. oil and gas industry, celebrated Trump's victory as a mandate for his energy policies. "Energy was on the ballot, and voters sent a clear signal that they want choices, not mandates," said API Chief Executive Mike Sommers.

Despite Biden's focus on climate change, his administration saw record oil production, influenced by global market dynamics beyond presidential control. This complex energy landscape underscores the intricate balance between fossil fuel reliance and transitioning to cleaner energy sources.