O.J. Simpson's Ex-Manager Claims Former Football Star Had Help in Murders

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16162223/original/open-uri20240413-18-imfug8?1713049318
ICARO Media Group
Politics
13/04/2024 22h59

In a shocking revelation, Norman Pardo, the ex-manager of O.J. Simpson, has come forward and claimed that the former football star did not act alone in the killings of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. Pardo made these claims during an interview with NewsNation's Elizabeth Vargas.

According to Pardo, Simpson was initially with another individual during the killings, but when Simpson got injured, he fled the scene, leaving the other person to carry out the rest of the murders. Pardo identified the other person as serial killer Glen Rogers, also known as "The Cross Country Killer" or "The Casanova Killer."

Rogers was convicted of first-degree murder in two separate trials for the deaths of two women, one in Florida in 1997 and another in California in June 1999. He is also suspected to be involved in several other unsolved murders across the United States.

Pardo claims that investigators found evidence linking Rogers to the crime scene, including where he worked and lived at the time. He alleges that a fight broke out between Goldman and Rogers, during which Simpson received a cut on his hand and subsequently left the scene.

"This is why O.J. never believed he committed the murders. He had already stepped out of the gate by the time it happened," Pardo explained, highlighting Simpson's belief in his innocence.

These claims have reignited the debate surrounding the infamous 1994 murder case, which captivated the nation and ultimately ended with Simpson's acquittal. Many people have long questioned the verdict and speculated about other possible suspects.

It is unclear at this point what impact, if any, Pardo's claims will have on the case. Nevertheless, this new information raises further questions about the events surrounding the tragic deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

As the public awaits any official investigations or responses to these accusations, the case continues to stir controversy and intrigue, nearly three decades after the initial trial.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related