Inquiry Launched Into Allegations of Financial Misconduct by Trump Aide Boris Epshteyn

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16406212/original/open-uri20241125-17-dc5730?1732570780
ICARO Media Group
Politics
25/11/2024 21h37

**Internal Investigation Probes Allegations Against Trump Aide Boris Epshteyn**

Attorneys for Donald Trump have recently launched an internal investigation into allegations that Boris Epshteyn, one of his top aides, has attempted to financially benefit from his influence within the Trump camp, according to multiple insider reports. The inquiry, which has been corroborated by several sources, focuses on allegations that Epshteyn requested payments in exchange for advocating certain candidates for administration roles or facilitating connections with key individuals in the incoming administration.

Specific instances under scrutiny include a reported request by Epshteyn for $100,000 per month in exchange for his services, according to sources familiar with the situation. The initial recommendations from those investigating the claims proposed that Epshteyn be distanced from Trump's inner circle and that he should no longer receive compensation from Trump-affiliated entities.

Epshteyn has denied the allegations, stating, "These fake claims are false and defamatory and will not distract us from Making America Great Again." Epshteyn has been a prominent figure in the transition process, frequently attending key meetings and briefings at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's resort in Palm Beach, Florida. Despite his considerable influence, Epshteyn's presence has often been contentious.

Known for his combative and outspoken nature, Epshteyn has a reputation for boasting about his close relationship with Trump. Recently, he played a significant role in organizing Trump's criminal defense strategy following multiple indictments. Although Epshteyn has not been accused of any illegal conduct, the internal investigation reflects a cautious approach by Trump's team to avoid any appearances of impropriety.

One focal point of the investigation is an alleged incident where Epshteyn suggested that Scott Bessent, Trump's nominee for Treasury secretary, pay him to promote his candidacy within Trump's circle. This proposition resulted in a heated altercation at Mar-a-Lago, where Epshteyn reportedly raised his voice at Bessent. However, Bessent did not comply with the payment request.

The investigation has uncovered additional claims of Epshteyn seeking payments in exchange for introductions and influence with the incoming administration. Trump's legal team is currently examining multiple similar allegations. According to sources, these concerns have reached Susie Wiles, the incoming White House chief of staff, although it remains unclear if Trump himself has been briefed on the matter.

Epshteyn has defended his actions as legitimate consulting work, but investigators have struggled to identify any substantive consulting services he has provided. One individual who spoke to the legal team described Epshteyn's behavior as a "pay-for-play" scheme, indicating that Epshteyn approached multiple people with similar propositions.

Despite the ongoing investigation, supporters of Epshteyn argue that the internal review stems from a lack of understanding of his dynamic with Trump and resentment over his influence within the Trump camp. Epshteyn has remained a constant companion to Trump, often participating in meetings and briefings unrelated to legal matters.

As the investigation unfolded, Epshteyn reportedly sent cease-and-desist messages to associates, denying the allegations and threatening legal action. Epshteyn has been integral to Trump's inner circle, even pushing for the appointment of former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz as attorney general, a nomination that was later withdrawn due to ethical concerns.

While the transition process this time around appears more streamlined than in 2016, it continues to be marred by internal conflicts and power struggles, indicative of the persistent turbulence within Trump's ranks.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related