Diddy Fires Back at Lil Rod's Lawsuit, Accusing Him of a Cash Grab Disguised as Serious Allegations
ICARO Media Group
In a dramatic turn of events, music mogul Diddy, along with his attorney Marc Agnifilo, has filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint from Rodney "Lil Rod" Jones, asserting that the lawsuit is merely an attempt to extort money by presenting false and salacious allegations of sex trafficking and RICO conspiracy. Diddy vehemently denies all claims and argues that the lawsuit is a ploy to tarnish his reputation and secure a quick settlement.
According to court documents obtained by TMZ, Jones recently posted a video on X alongside rapper "Uncle Murda," where they were seen laughing about the ongoing lawsuit against Diddy. In the video, Jones allegedly demanded payment from Diddy by a specific deadline, highlighting his affiliation with Chicago and suggesting consequences if his demands weren't met.
Diddy's legal team challenges Jones' assertion that his "business or property" suffered as a result of non-payment for services rendered on Diddy's upcoming album, "The Love Album: Off The Grid." They argue that Jones failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
Additionally, Diddy questions the absence of a primary claim from Jones under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, indicating that there is no evidence to support Jones being coerced into engaging in any sexual act in exchange for anything of value.
Moreover, Diddy maintains that Jones has not provided specific details regarding the alleged sexual assault and sexual harassment claims made against him. The rap mogul also disputes Jones' other claims, including premise liability, emotional distress, and breach of oral contract. Diddy contends that Jones has not proven that he exercised control over the premises where any alleged assaults occurred, nor has Jones adequately demonstrated emotional distress. Furthermore, Diddy argues that the breach of oral contract claim is time-barred under the statute of frauds.
In an interesting twist, Jones' attorney, Tyrone Blackburn, has faced his own legal challenges. In April of this year, a judge referred Blackburn to the grievance committee of New York's federal court district due to "glaring deficiencies" in five separate lawsuits he had filed. Blackburn, in response, accuses Diddy's current attorneys of engaging in a billing exercise and attempting to secure a dismissal before their client faces potential indictment.
This legal battle continues to unfold, with both sides vehemently defending their positions. Diddy stands firm in his denial of Jones' allegations, while Jones persists in seeking redress for his perceived grievances. Only time will tell how this high-profile lawsuit will ultimately be resolved.