Diddy Combs Accused of Witness Manipulation and Obstruction in Federal Investigation
ICARO Media Group
### Diddy Combs Allegedly Obstructs Federal Investigation, Attempts Jury Manipulation
Renowned music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing serious allegations from federal prosecutors who claim he has been actively undermining a federal investigation into his sex trafficking case despite being held in federal custody. Combs is said to have utilized phone accounts of eight fellow inmates at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn to avoid being monitored, violating procedural rules by compensating the inmates through intermediaries.
Prosecutors have revealed that Combs used unauthorized three-way calls and a third-party system to contact individuals not approved on his contact list, sending hundreds of text messages in the process. These revelations were part of a court filing aiming to prevent Combs from obtaining another bail hearing. Combs’ defense team has refused to comment on the latest developments.
Awaiting trial on various charges including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and prostitution-related offenses, Combs has pleaded not guilty. His legal troubles are compounded by multiple civil lawsuits accusing him of sexual assault and other misconduct over the past year, which he has consistently denied.
Prosecutors argue that Combs has attempted to manipulate potential witnesses and accusers to either remain silent or testify favorably on his behalf. According to them, Combs has engaged in social media campaigns to influence public opinion and potential jurors, and has leaked materials that could favor his case. They further allege that he has contacted witnesses through intermediaries, all in an effort to evade law enforcement scrutiny and disrupt the judicial process.
A federal grand jury is actively and continuously investigating Combs following his arrest in September. The government's stance remains firm as CNN reported on October 31, citing three sources that detailed the investigative proceedings.
Judge Arun Subramanian's recent refusal to silence potential witnesses and impose a gag order reflects the ongoing judicial emphasis on accusers' right to free speech. These decisions come amidst Combs' repeated attempts to challenge the prosecution’s narrative and diminish their allegations against him.
In their opposition to Combs’ renewed bail request, prosecutors insist that his arguments have already been rejected by two previous judges and provide no substantial new information to warrant another hearing. Highlighting Combs' ongoing attempts to manipulate public perception and evade custody regulations, prosecutors maintain that he is unlikely to comply with any bail conditions.
Combs’ legal team has proposed a revised bail package, including a $50 million bond and stringent home detention measures, but this proposal appears similar to those already dismissed by the court. The prosecutors emphasize that Combs’ prior and continuous disregard for regulations within federal custody demonstrates a profound risk of non-compliance if released on bail.