****

As evidenced by the thrilling matchup between Alabama and Georgia, the regular season remains a cornerstone of college football's excitement. However, a new playoff proposal from the SEC and Big Ten threatens to change that dynamic significantly.

For many years, critics have argued that a college football playoff would reduce the importance of regular season games. This argument was largely a smokescreen intended to protect the interests of certain stakeholders. Now, the involvement of new power players in the sport suggests that these fears could become reality.

Traditionally, bowl game executives fiercely defended their syndicate, claiming — without much detail — that any alternative postseason format would harm the regular season. Their concerns were vague, covering aspects like stakes, fan engagement, and television viewership. However, these fears appeared exaggerated, as the introduction of the four-team College Football Playoff in 2014 showed that the regular season's vigor remained intact.

The financial lure of expanding the playoff format has revived old arguments about preserving the excitement of regular season games. The proposed increase from a four-team to a 12-team playoff initially raised questions about whether it would dilute the high stakes of regular-season matchups. However, Alabama's recent victory over Georgia demonstrated that even with an expanded playoff, the drama and significance of top-tier clashes were undiminished.

Alabama's triumph set a prime example of the season's stakes: it positions the Crimson Tide favorably for the SEC championship, potentially earning them an automatic playoff bid and a first-round bye. Georgia, despite the loss, remains a strong contender for the playoff, but must now be flawless against formidable opponents to secure their spot. Such scenarios maintain the crucial weight of regular-season victories even within an expanded playoff framework.

However, discussions about expanding the playoffs further to 14 teams, as noted by ESPN, have stirred concerns. The SEC and Big Ten's reported plan to secure four automatic playoff bids each raises significant implications. If these powerhouses succeed, regular season losses could become less consequential, potentially diminishing the drama and urgency that currently characterize college football.

In February, playoff officials acknowledged that the 12-team format would only last through the 2025 season. Afterward, a 14-team bracket could emerge, featuring automatic bids heavily skewed towards the SEC and Big Ten. This disproportionate allocation would offer more financial gain to these conferences, maintaining their dominance while reducing the competitive balance.

Alarmingly, if such proposals come to fruition, regular season games like Alabama vs. Georgia might lose their edge. Teams could afford more losses while still comfortably securing playoff spots, undermining the historic tension and excitement of each game.

The potential imbalance posed by granting eight of 14 postseason spots to SEC and Big Ten teams could erode the value of regular-season performances, especially in other conferences. This transformation, driven by financial motives, risks making regular season games less significant and could turn the playoff into a numbers game favoring select leagues.

The future of college football hangs in the balance as power dynamics and financial interests drive discussions. Whether these proposed changes take effect will shape the sport's landscape, determining if cherished regular-season showdowns retain their critical stakes or become mere steps to an inevitable playoff berth.