Ohio House Overrides Veto, Passes Bill Restricting Transgender Medical Care for Minors

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/15985260/original/open-uri20240110-55-ekph38?1704926283
ICARO Media Group
Politics
10/01/2024 22h34

In a decisive 65-28 vote, the Ohio House has successfully overridden Governor Mike DeWine's veto against Ohio House Bill 68. The bill aims to ban transgender minors from receiving gender-affirming medical care and prevent transgender girls from participating in girls' and women's sports. The Ohio Senate is set to vote on whether to also override the veto on January 24, requiring a 60% majority in both houses to proceed.

Under this legislation, physicians providing gender-affirming care for trans youth would face disciplinary action by the relevant professional licensing board. However, the bill contains exceptions for non-transgender youth, indicating a disparity in access to medical care.

It is worth noting that transgender individuals already receiving care would be grandfathered in and allowed to continue their treatment.

The passage of this bill aligns Ohio with a growing trend, as at least 21 states have already implemented restrictions on access to gender-affirming care. Several states' laws have been challenged in court, with a federal judge ruling that Arkansas' ban on gender-affirming care for minors was unconstitutional. Comparable laws in Georgia, Indiana, Idaho, Texas, and Montana have been temporarily blocked while legal battles continue.

Governor DeWine, who vetoed the bill, expressed agreement with some of the concerns raised by lawmakers. He believed that the current version of the bill would harm transgender youth and interfere with families' decision-making processes. In a press conference on December 29, DeWine emphasized that these choices should rest with parents who have witnessed their child's struggles firsthand.

DeWine proposed alternative regulations to address gender-affirming care, including bans on surgeries for minors. His discussions with affected families revealed that surgery was not the primary focus. Physicians have confirmed that mental health care plays a significant role in the initial stages of treatment. Puberty blockers, a reversible form of gender-affirming care, offer transgender youth the opportunity to explore their gender identity without the development of permanent sex characteristics.

For older teenagers, hormone therapy is utilized to align physical appearance with gender identity. These changes are gradual and partially reversible. Surgeries on adolescents are considered rare and assessed on a case-by-case basis, according to medical professionals.

DeWine also suggested reporting and data collection requirements for individuals receiving gender-affirming care and sought limitations on "pop-up clinics" serving the transgender community.

More than 20 prominent medical associations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association, have stated that gender-affirming care is safe and effective. These organizations assert that this care can be medically necessary, improving both the physical and mental health of transgender individuals.

It is essential to address the challenges faced by transgender youth, who are more likely to experience anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation due to discrimination and gender dysphoria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have highlighted these alarming trends.

Research has shown that hormone therapy can positively impact the mental health of transgender adolescents and teenagers, as reported in a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

While the bill also includes restrictions regarding transgender participation in sports, Governor DeWine emphasized his focus on the portion of the bill that would significantly impact the lives of numerous children and families—the gender-affirming care provision.

The outcome of the Ohio Senate vote will determine whether this controversial bill becomes law, further intensifying the ongoing debates surrounding transgender rights and access to medical care for minors.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related