In a controversial move just hours before a vote to remove her from her position, Michigan Republican Party Chair Kristina Karamo unveiled a plan to close all primary elections in the state, with the exception of the presidential election, to the general public. The proposal suggests transitioning to a caucus system consisting of elected delegates to nominate candidates. However, this plan has raised concerns due to conflicting with Michigan election law.

Under Michigan election law, major political parties are required to hold a "general primary" in August to select candidates for most offices, excluding president, vice president, secretary of state, attorney general, and lieutenant governor. Angela Benander, Michigan Department of State Spokesperson, stated that Karamo's plan directly conflicts with the state's election law. Any changes to the primary election process would necessitate legislative action.

Legal expert Steve Liedel also expressed skepticism towards the proposal, highlighting that even if the Michigan Republican Party were to adopt the plan, it would hold no legal weight as the Secretary of State would still place candidates who filed for nomination on the ballot. Liedel further explained that implementing the plan would require a change in election law, either through legislative action or by the party receiving less than 5% of the statewide vote in the next election, which would relegate them to minor party status.

The current disarray within Republican state leadership adds another layer of complexity to the situation. Following a vote by a breakaway faction of state leaders to remove Karamo from her position, both Karamo and the would-be acting chair, Malinda Pego, have released contradictory statements claiming to be the rightful leaders of the party. A legal battle is anticipated to settle the dispute.

Criticism of the proposal has also emerged from within the party. Senate minority leader Aric Nesbitt, R-Porter Township, who holds the title of the most senior elected Republican in state government, expressed his disapproval, accusing the party of working to disenfranchise millions of Republican voters. Nesbitt called on party members to focus instead on energizing Republican voters and supporting candidates for the upcoming 2024 elections.

As the debate over the proposal continues, it remains to be seen whether the Michigan Republican Party will proceed with their plan or if it will face significant obstacles in the form of legal requirements and internal disputes.