Maine Secretary of State Disqualifies Trump from State's Presidential Primary Ballot, Citing Constitutional Grounds

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/15963984/original/open-uri20231229-18-16rcmas?1703884105
ICARO Media Group
Politics
29/12/2023 21h07

In a groundbreaking decision, Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows has disqualified former President Donald Trump from appearing on her state's presidential primary ballot. Citing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, Bellows stated that Trump's involvement in the events leading up to the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol rendered him unfit to be a candidate.

Maine becomes the second state, after Colorado, to bar Trump from the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Unlike other states, the responsibility of evaluating a candidate's qualifications falls upon the secretary of state in Maine. This decision has prompted the Trump campaign to pledge an appeal, further igniting the debate over Trump's eligibility.

Bellows, a Democrat who assumed office in 2021, defended her ruling, emphasizing the need to uphold the foundations of the U.S. government. She stated, "The U.S. Constitution does not tolerate an assault on the foundations of our government. And Maine election law required me to act in response." Bellows further pointed to the unprecedented events of January 6th and Trump's alleged involvement in the insurrection as proof that he should be disqualified.

Under Maine law, voters can challenge a candidate's eligibility, which then triggers a public hearing where the challengers must present their case. In adhering to state statute, Bellows swiftly issued her decision, maintaining that she was not allowed to wait for the United States Supreme Court to intervene in the matter.

While Bellows acknowledged that her decision might soon be rendered obsolete by ongoing legal proceedings, she made it clear that she had a responsibility to act. Trump's campaign has expressed intentions to file a legal objection in state court to prevent Bellows' decision from taking effect.

The interpretation of the 14th Amendment's Section 3 and its application to the presidency is still a subject of contention. Trump has argued that his actions and speech are protected by the First Amendment and that the 14th Amendment does not apply to the presidency. However, Bellows rejected these arguments, stating that the First Amendment does not permit incitement of an insurrection.

In her ruling, Bellows highlighted the evidence presented during the public hearing held on December 15, where Trump's eligibility faced three challenges filed by registered voters. Two of the challenges argued that Trump's involvement in the insurrection violates Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Another challenger asserted that Trump should be disqualified under the 22nd Amendment, which restricts presidents from serving more than two terms.

Bellows ultimately determined that Trump was disqualified under Section 3 but could not be barred under the 22nd Amendment. She emphasized that the challengers did not dispute that Joseph Biden won the 2020 election and that Trump's claim was not supported by factual evidence.

With the Republican primaries in both Maine and Colorado scheduled for March 5, the timing of Bellows' decision is crucial. She expects Maine's Superior Court to rule on the appeal before or by January 17, while also ensuring that military and overseas ballots are prepared by January 19.

Bellows' unprecedented decision to disqualify a presidential candidate based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has ignited a fierce debate on the interpretation of constitutional provisions and their implications for future elections. The legal battle surrounding Trump's eligibility continues to shape the dynamics of the upcoming primaries, with potential impacts extending beyond the two states involved.

As the controversy unfolds, the nation watches with anticipation to see how the courts will ultimately decide on the matter and its potential ramifications for future challenges to Trump's eligibility across the country.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related