House Intelligence Chair Faces Criticism for Vague Warning on Russia's Nuclear Capabilities in Space
ICARO Media Group
In a surprising turn of events, House Intelligence Chair Mike Turner has come under fire for issuing a cryptic public warning about an undisclosed national security threat, which was later confirmed to be Russia's development of nuclear capabilities in space. Turner's call for the declassification of all related information has led to accusations of recklessness and political maneuvering.
One of Turner's fellow Republican lawmakers, Rep. Andy Ogles, has called for a formal inquiry into the Chair's statement, describing it as "reckless" and suggesting that it was an attempt to rally support for his legislative priorities of providing aid to Ukraine and renewing a controversial surveillance power. Both Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill, along with intelligence officials in the Biden administration, were caught off guard by Turner's remarks and expressed concerns about the vague nature of the warning.
President Joe Biden's top national security spokesperson, John Kirby, confirmed the threat on Thursday, stating that it pertained to Russia's development of an antisatellite capability. However, he clarified that it was not an active capability currently deployed. Kirby emphasized that the weapon in question was not capable of attacking humans or causing physical destruction on Earth.
The cryptic nature of Turner's statement has raised questions about his motivations. Some have speculated whether he intended to emphasize the urgency of passing additional aid for Ukraine or reauthorizing the controversial surveillance tool. The statement has also created confusion among lawmakers and policymakers regarding the immediate threat Russians' new capabilities pose to Americans and the United States' ability to defend against potential offensive devices launched into orbit by Moscow.
Defending his warning, Turner stated that his committee had worked in consultation with the Biden administration to notify Congress about the national security threat. He pointed out that the House Intelligence Committee had voted 23 to 1 to make the information available to all members of Congress, and White House officials confirmed its seriousness.
Nevertheless, the public release of such information from the head of a congressional intelligence committee is exceedingly rare. Kirby expressed the intelligence community's concerns about broad declassification and denied any presumption that the administration had given a green light for the information to be made public. He assured that eventually, the intelligence would be shared with the American people.
National security adviser Jake Sullivan expressed surprise at Turner's statement but acknowledged that it was his choice to make it. The new intelligence, shared with Congress over the past few months, indicated Russia's progress in developing an antisatellite weapon involving nuclear technology for use in space. However, sources familiar with the intelligence emphasized that Moscow still had a long way to go before completing the project.
Criticism of Turner's decision to make the information public has mounted. Rep. Adam Smith criticized it as a "highly, highly risky move." Furthermore, a senior intelligence official echoed Rep. Ogles' belief that Turner may have been aiming to raise awareness about the importance of reauthorizing the foreign surveillance power known as Section 702. Some of the gathered intelligence is said to have relied on Section 702, which has faced criticism for its incidental collection of data from Americans. Turner opposes proposed changes to the law, arguing that they would impede vital national security work.
Others speculated that Turner's intention was to highlight the need for Congress to pass the foreign aid supplemental bill, which includes $60 billion for Ukraine's ongoing conflict with Russia. Regardless of his motives, lawmakers are reportedly angered by the way the House Intelligence Chair handled the disclosure. Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the committee, had advised against the release, but Turner went ahead with it.
National Security Adviser Sullivan is scheduled to brief the House Intelligence Committee, which is expected to address the fallout from Turner's statement.