In a significant turn of events, a federal appeals court has overturned the conviction of former Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, stating that his due process rights were violated when he was tried in California for alleged foreign campaign donations. The decision, published on Tuesday by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, determined that the Nebraska lawmaker should not have been prosecuted in Los Angeles, as the specific crimes he was accused of took place in Washington, D.C., and Nebraska.

The three-judge panel also dismissed the prosecutors' proposition that criminal conduct can be charged wherever it affects a federal investigation. Consequently, this ruling highlights the importance of jurisdiction and the adherence to due process in criminal trials.

Fortenberry resigned from his congressional seat in March 2022, following a conviction by a Los Angeles jury for lying to federal authorities about accepting an illegal campaign contribution from a foreign national. The pressure to step down came from both congressional leadership and Nebraska's former Governor, Pete Ricketts.

Upon learning of Tuesday's decision, Fortenberry and his wife expressed gratitude. In a statement to The Associated Press, the former lawmaker said, "we are gratified by the Ninth Circuit's decision," and extended their appreciation to those who stood by them during this challenging time.

The allegations against Fortenberry stemmed from claims that Gilbert Chagoury, a Nigerian-Lebanese businessman residing in Paris, had given him a $30,000 campaign contribution through strawman donors at a 2016 fundraiser in Los Angeles. Elias Ayoub, the organizer of the event, later cooperated with the FBI as a witness and informed Fortenberry about the source of the funds in a phone call in 2018.

However, Fortenberry denied any knowledge of foreign campaign contributions during his encounters with federal investigators in Nebraska and Washington, D.C., in 2019. In 2021, he was charged with making false statements to investigators and conspiring to falsify and conceal material facts. Prosecutors insisted on trying the former lawmaker in Los Angeles, arguing that the illegal contributions were made there, although he was never formally charged with receiving illegal funds.

Fortenberry was ultimately sentenced to two years' probation and ordered to pay a $25,000 fine.

While the ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court was not entirely unforeseen, Judge James Donato, one of the three judges presiding over Fortenberry's case and the author of Tuesday's ruling, signaled his support for the lawmaker's contention that the Justice Department had violated his rights by trying him in Los Angeles. This decision serves as a reminder of the significance of procedural fairness and the importance of appropriate jurisdiction when it comes to the criminal justice system.

As this legal battle comes to a close, the implications of this verdict are sure to have a lasting impact on the interpretation and application of due process rights within the realm of federal convictions.

(Note: This article is written based on the provided text. No additional information or context has been added.)