The 2024 NFL Draft made history with a record-breaking number of quarterbacks selected in the first 12 picks. As the dust settles on this unpredictable draft, the question arises: which draft observations were overreactions and which were realities?

One of the biggest talking points surrounds the future of Atlanta Falcons quarterback Kirk Cousins. Some observers argue that it's an overreaction to suggest that Cousins won't be the Falcons quarterback in 2026. However, the reality is that the Falcons selected Michael Penix Jr. at No. 8 overall, indicating their intention to hand over the reins to him once Cousins' contract ends. With potential salary cap savings of $32.5 million, the Falcons have a strategic plan in place for the transition.

Another observation that sparked debate was the assertion that the Minnesota Vikings had the best draft in the first round. While it may be an overreaction to claim this, the Vikings did make savvy moves by trading up to secure quarterback J.J. McCarthy and defensive player Dallas Turner. However, it was their NFC North rivals, the Chicago Bears, who arguably had the best draft. With the additions of Caleb Williams and Rome Odunze, along with a skillful offensive lineup, the Bears have set themselves up for success.

Speaking of J.J. McCarthy, there is a strong belief that he is poised for a remarkable rookie season. Equipped with an impressive supporting cast, including top wide receivers Justin Jefferson and Jordan Addison, McCarthy has the tools and talent to excel in his debut season. With the likes of Aaron Jones and Christian Darrisaw rounding out the offense, McCarthy appears primed for immediate success in the NFL.

One observation that divided opinions was the justification for taking six quarterbacks in the top 12 picks. While some argue that there were better players available, the reality is that teams like the Bears, Commanders, and Patriots had urgent quarterback needs to address. The surprising selection of Michael Penix Jr. by the Falcons at No. 8 further shook up the draft, impacting multiple teams' strategies.

The New York Giants made a smart move by not forcing themselves into selecting a quarterback in the first round. Instead, they opted for wide receiver Malik Nabers at No. 6 overall, providing their quarterback, Daniel Jones, with a new top target. Nabers' route-running and ability to create yards after the catch make him an immediate asset for Jones. The Giants are not ruling out acquiring a franchise quarterback in the future but have wisely chosen to build their roster strategically.

As for the Philadelphia Eagles, it's premature to declare that rookie cornerback Quinyon Mitchell will start in Week 1. While Mitchell possesses raw talent and physicality, the Eagles will take their time developing his skills and may opt for him to contribute on special teams initially. The presence of seasoned cornerbacks Darius Slay and James Bradberry gives the Eagles the luxury of patience in grooming Mitchell.

Finally, the Buffalo Bills' decision to pass on wide receivers in the first round has raised eyebrows. By trading down twice, they allowed the Kansas City Chiefs to snatch up Xavier Worthy, a player who could have greatly bolstered the Bills' offense. This missed opportunity has allowed an AFC rival to improve, leaving the Bills with a need for pass-catching help.

In conclusion, the 2024 NFL Draft has ignited spirited debates over various draft observations. While some perceptions may be overreactions, others reflect realities that will shape the future of football. As teams analyze their selections and prepare for the upcoming season, only time will tell which observations hold true and which prove to be mere speculation.