Seven & i Holdings Rejects Circle K's Takeover Proposal Citing Undervaluation and Regulatory Concerns
ICARO Media Group
In a recent development, Seven & i Holdings, the parent company of 7-Eleven, has firmly declined Circle K's takeover attempt. The rejection, as outlined in a letter to Circle K's owner, Alimentation Couche-Tard, highlights that the proposed acquisition is not in the best interest of 7&i shareholders and other stakeholders. The decision to reject the preliminary offer, which amounted to $14.86 per share in cash, follows an extensive review by Seven & i's board of directors and a special committee of independent directors.
Led by its chair, Stephen Dacus, who also serves as the chairman of the board, the special committee diligently evaluated the nonbinding proposal with the assistance of financial and legal advisors. After careful consideration, the board ultimately concluded that the offer undervalues the company and fails to adequately address significant regulatory concerns.
While emphasizing their commitment to maximizing value for shareholders and stakeholders, the board expressed skepticism regarding the timing and valuation of Circle K's proposal. Seven & i Holdings firmly believes that it can generate greater shareholder value through its existing strategies, particularly its operations in the United States.
The letter to Alimentation Couche-Tard stated, "We are open to engaging in sincere discussions should you put forth a proposal that fully recognizes our standalone intrinsic value and addresses our concerns regarding certainty of closing in the current regulatory environment." However, the board made it clear that the current offer did not provide a solid basis for substantive discussions on a potential transaction.
One of the key concerns raised by the board was the proposal's lack of clarity regarding potential regulatory challenges, particularly under U.S. competition laws. The offer failed to outline any potential divestitures or address the complexities involved in obtaining regulatory approval.
Despite the rejection, Seven & i Holdings remains open to future proposals and made their response public in order to maintain transparency with shareholders and stakeholders in light of the proposal's disclosure.
Circle K had initially made a bid of $38 billion to acquire 7-Eleven back in August, surpassing its market value by 20% at the time. The proposed acquisition aimed to create the largest convenience store retailer in the United States. However, concerns over regulatory scrutiny due to the combined market share of the two companies emerged, potentially posing challenges for the deal.
The interest shown by Circle K in 7-Eleven was largely driven by the desire to enhance its food offerings, leveraging the popularity of 7-Eleven's Asian food business. Couche-Tard's need to diversify beyond fuel sales, which have been declining due to the rise of electric vehicles, also played a role in their bid.
While the rejection of Circle K's takeover offer had a positive impact on Seven & i Holdings' stock price, it has now placed the company in a strategic position where they must carefully weigh the potential benefits against the challenges involved, including regulatory hurdles and the reaction of activist investors.
Notably, a similar merger between U.S. Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel, valued at $14 billion, has also encountered significant obstacles. Despite CEO David Burritt's optimism about the merger's advantages, opposition from the United Steelworkers union, politicians, and concerns raised by President Biden regarding potential job losses and the impact on American steel industry have cast uncertainties over the deal. The merger now awaits approval from the Justice Department and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which will assess potential national security implications.
In conclusion, Seven & i Holdings has rejected Circle K's takeover proposal, citing concerns over undervaluation and regulatory challenges. Despite the rejection, the company remains open to future proposals that recognize its standalone value and address regulatory uncertainties.