****

In the wake of the relatively uneventful 2024 NBA trade deadline, there are two perspectives on what the future might hold for player movement. The pessimistic view suggests that the new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) has heavily restricted player trades, potentially solidifying the slow pace of the 2024 deadline as the new normal. This view highlights the fact that 11 teams currently above the first apron essentially cannot trade with one another, and several other teams face different restrictions, primarily impacting the very teams seeking midseason upgrades.

On the contrary, the optimist's stance posits that while the CBA presents obstacles, it does not eliminate the potential for creative solutions. Historically, teams have adapted to new CBAs after a period of adjustment, finding ways to maneuver the restrictions over time. With a significant portion of the league aiming for championship contention, the stakes are high enough to drive teams to innovate in their trade approaches.

True superstar trades may be improbable due to CBA limitations, but speculation remains about which players have simpler paths to trades. Given the financial and positional contexts, certain players stand out as more likely trade candidates. For instance, Brandon Ingram, whose summer trade attempts by the Pelicans failed, seems vulnerable. New Orleans' acquisition of Dejounte Murray, who plays a similar role to Ingram, and the emergence of younger players like Trey Murphy and Herb Jones make Ingram a less fitting long-term piece. The Pelicans' need for a center adds to the urgency of potentially trading Ingram, who might be seen more as a financial figure than a valuable asset if a deal is struck near the deadline.

Similarly, Julius Randle's situation with the New York Knicks demonstrates potential trade motivations. While he serves as a secondary shot-creator alongside Jalen Brunson, the Knicks' need for a reliable rim-protecting center could outweigh their desire to retain Randle. If the Knicks find themselves short of being a genuine contender early in the season, Randle's sizable salary could be instrumental in securing a much-needed center.

Cleveland Cavaliers' Darius Garland is another notable name, especially after reports indicated a preference for a trade if Donovan Mitchell extended his contract. Although that noise has subsided, Garland's fit within the team's dynamics remains precarious. Should Garland struggle to adapt to an off-ball role or the Cavaliers require a more substantial wing, Garland might be on the move.

Meanwhile, the Chicago Bulls face a challenging situation with Zach LaVine. With three years remaining on a five-year max contract and a disappointing last season, trading LaVine could be tough. The Bulls might find themselves eager to offload his contract, significantly if LaVine's performance doesn't improve.

For the Portland Trail Blazers, Jerami Grant's role is uncertain following the franchise player's trade request shortly after Grant re-signed a five-year deal. With a focus on rebuilding, Grant's value as a high-end offensive wing could yield a first-round pick, aligning more closely with Portland's current trajectory.

Potential trades are not limited to high-profile players. Golden State Warriors' Jonathan Kuminga and Houston Rockets' Jalen Green represent younger, extension-eligible players whose teams might consider moving them for a star acquisition. Likewise, veteran role players like Atlanta Hawks' Bogdan Bogdanovic could serve as strategic moves, given the team's younger, emerging core.

As the NBA gears up for another season, navigating the complexities of the CBA while balancing team needs and player movements will be crucial. Teams will have to get creative, and the landscape suggests that while superstar trades might be less likely, several players could find themselves on the move under the right conditions.