MLB Teams Ranked by Talent Core for Next Two Seasons

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16341496/original/open-uri20240905-17-1d2va05?1725562660
ICARO Media Group
News
05/09/2024 18h56

In an annual tradition, the rankings of the 30 Major League Baseball (MLB) teams by their core of talent have been unveiled. This unique ranking system takes into account the players under team control for the next two full seasons, disregarding salaries and age. The goal is to assess each team's strength and potential over a two-plus year period.

To ensure a fair assessment, the players have been divided into three tiers: elite, plus, and solid. The elite tier consists of players with a talent level of 5+ Wins Above Replacement (WAR) or those who are considered MVP candidates. The plus tier includes players with a talent level ranging from 3-5 WAR, while the solid tier encompasses players with a talent level of 1.5-3 WAR, including lower-end starters and valuable role players.

It is important to note that the rankings also take into consideration players with vesting options or club/player options that are likely to be picked up. However, players with opt-out clauses that are likely to be exercised have been excluded from the rankings, adding an element of subjectivity to the process.

The rankings are based on the preference within each tier, allowing room for debate and discussion about the placement of individual players. The overall ranking is not determined by an algorithm but rather by a thorough comparison of each team's talent core.

While comparing prospects in Double-A with proven veterans having a down season can be challenging, this ranking system aims to project their value over the next 2.5 years.

Fans and baseball enthusiasts alike eagerly await the rankings, as it provides valuable insights into the strength and potential of each team's talent core. Stay tuned as we reveal the order in which each team stands in terms of their talent core for the upcoming seasons.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related