Trump International Airport. The bill, known as H.R. 7845, has garnered attention for its attempt to honor the former president, but critics argue that it is nothing more than a stunt to gain press coverage and show unwavering support for Trump.

The lead sponsor of the bill, Pennsylvania Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, expressed his admiration for Trump, claiming that under his leadership, the nation had reached unparalleled greatness. He stated, "As millions of domestic and international travelers fly through the airport, there is no better symbol of freedom, prosperity, and strength than hearing 'Welcome to Trump International Airport' as they land on American soil."

However, opposition to the bill has been swift. Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly responded with a biting criticism, suggesting that if Republicans truly wanted to honor Trump, they should consider naming a federal prison after him as he faces 91 felony charges. Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin joined in, humorously remarking that if the airport were named after Trump, there might be continued round-trip service to Moscow.

Critics argue that the bill holds no real merit and is merely an attempt to appease Trump and gain favor. Virginia Rep. Don Beyer pointed out that renaming Dulles after Trump would disregard the protests that took place at the airport during the early days of the Trump administration, particularly in response to the controversial "Muslim ban."

It is worth noting that the bill's significance lies not only in its intention but also in its lead sponsor, Rep. Guy Reschenthaler. As the House GOP's chief deputy whip and a member of influential committees, Reschenthaler's involvement raises questions as to why such a prominent figure chose to champion this bill. Some argue that he should have passed the idea to a less influential member who could benefit from the attention.

While the bill has garnered attention and sparked debate, it remains uncertain whether it will gain the necessary support to pass. Democrats have been quick to dismiss it as a ploy to flatter Trump, with Rep. Connolly branding it as "innovative obsequiousness."

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it is likely to face further scrutiny and resistance from those who believe that renaming the airport after a controversial figure like Trump would not accurately represent the values and history associated with the current namesake, John Foster Dulles.

Ultimately, the fate of H.R. 7845 remains uncertain, but one thing is clear - it has ignited a heated debate regarding the appropriateness of naming public institutions after divisive political figures.