In a major development, Google is set to make it increasingly difficult to install certain Android apps with the release of Android 15. This move comes as a new minimum requirement for app compatibility is introduced by the tech giant.

Previously, Android apps were obligated to target at least Android 6.0 (Marshmallow). However, with Android 15, Google intends to raise the bar even higher. According to Android Police, as seen in the code of Android 15 Developer Preview 2, the new minimum requirement will be Android 7.1 or SDK version 24. It should be noted that this requirement has not been finalized yet.

Evidence of this change is already visible, as an older app targeting Android 6.0 installed without any issues on Android 14, but encountered installation problems on Android 15. This was confirmed by testing the app through ADB. While a Google Play Protect prompt on the device allowed for installation, it ultimately failed due to the OS blocking the process.

For most users, this new requirement is unlikely to have a significant impact as the majority of apps already target newer versions of Android. In fact, Android 6.0 is often the oldest version supported by popular apps, with most developers choosing to target the latest Android releases.

However, for apps that are affected, developers will need to raise the target version in order to ensure continued installation. This means that these apps will need to be updated by developers to meet the new Android 15 minimum requirement.

As Android 15 continues its development and approaches its eventual release, Google's decision to raise the minimum requirement for app installation will aim to improve security and performance for users by encouraging the use of more up-to-date versions of the operating system.

It remains to be seen how developers and users will adapt to this change, but the shift towards higher minimum requirements signals Google's commitment to keeping Android devices and apps secure and up-to-date.

Note: The provided text had limited information and did not mention any specific dates, entities, or numbers, so the article has been written using the available context.