Forensic Scientist Manipulated DNA Test Results in Hundreds of Cases, Investigation Finds

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16099094/original/open-uri20240309-17-gozkwu?1710024197
ICARO Media Group
Politics
09/03/2024 22h40

In a shocking revelation, an internal affairs investigation conducted by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has uncovered that a former forensic scientist manipulated or omitted DNA test results in hundreds of cases. The investigation into Yvonne "Missy" Woods revealed that her actions affected a total of 652 cases between 2008 and 2023, raising concerns about the integrity of the agency's laboratory results.

The CBI released the findings of the investigation on Friday, stating that Woods' handling of DNA testing data had put all of her work in question. As a result, the agency has begun a full review of her previous work dating back to 1994. The CBI emphasized its commitment to ensuring the accuracy and completeness of its entire catalog of records, and has engaged third-party investigative resources to protect the integrity of the inquiry.

Woods, a 29-year veteran of the agency's crime lab, was placed on administrative leave in October when authorities became aware of potential deviations from standard operating procedures in her DNA sample testing. She subsequently retired on November 6 without performing any further laboratory work.

The CBI internal investigation, conducted in collaboration with the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, did not find evidence of falsified DNA matches or fabricated data by Woods. However, the investigation uncovered that Woods had omitted material facts in official criminal justice records, tampering with DNA testing results and violating agency policies regarding data retention and quality control measures.

CBI Director Chris Schaefer emphasized the importance of public trust in institutions and pledged a thorough and transparent response to this breach of trust. Meanwhile, a separate criminal investigation into Woods' conduct is ongoing, and the CBI is cooperating with law enforcement agencies across the state.

The implications of Woods' actions are significant. Boulder District Attorney Michael Dougherty revealed that Woods had testified as a witness in 15 open cases and 55 closed cases. While it is too early to determine the full impact, prosecutors and district attorneys' offices are anxious to assess the potential consequences on victims, the accused, and the pursuit of justice.

This case is not an isolated incident within the Colorado forensic science community. In the course of the investigation, the CBI discovered a separate case involving another DNA analyst from the Weld County Sheriff's Office, indicating a broader issue that needs to be addressed. The Northern Colorado Regional Forensic Laboratory, where the analyst worked, has already terminated the individual's employment following an internal investigation.

In response to these revelations, the CBI is conducting a comprehensive audit of all DNA analysts to ensure the accuracy and completeness of their records. This proactive measure aims to restore public confidence and prevent similar incidents in the future.

As the consequences of Woods' actions unfold, the legal community and affected parties await further information. Attorneys for James Hunter, who is currently in prison, have filed a federal lawsuit on his behalf, claiming that he was prosecuted based on fabricated and false evidence involving Woods as the lead scientist on his case. The lawsuit alleges that Hunter was wrongly convicted of a 2002 burglary and sexual assault due to flawed DNA evidence.

Woods' attorney, Ryan Brackley, maintains that his client has never created false DNA matches or exclusions and has never testified falsely. He asserts that Woods has been a loyal and dedicated forensic scientist who has trained numerous professionals in the field.

The ramifications of this investigation will undoubtedly be far-reaching, as concerns around the credibility and reliability of forensic science in Colorado continue to emerge. The CBI's commitment to a transparent and thorough review is crucial to restoring public trust in our justice system.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related