In a surprising turn of events, ESPN's decision to honor Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, with the Tillman Award has drawn criticism from Pat Tillman's mother and social media users alike. The award, named after the late football player-turned-Army-serviceman, is traditionally given to individuals who have made significant contributions to the world, particularly in the realm of military service and veterans' support.

ESPN, along with the support of the Tillman Foundation, defended their choice by highlighting Prince Harry's involvement with The Invictus Games Foundation. As the Games celebrate their 10th year, they continue to promote healing through the power of sport for military service members and veterans globally.

However, Mary Tillman, Pat Tillman's mother, voiced her disappointment and questioned the selection of Prince Harry. In an interview with The Daily Mail, she expressed shock that ESPN would choose such a "controversial and divisive individual" for the honor. Mary Tillman argued that there are other recipients who might be more fitting, citing the remarkable work being done by individuals in the veteran community.

The Tillman Award has historically been bestowed upon lesser-known individuals, including former military members and medical professionals who have saved lives. Granting this award provides recognition and exposure to smaller causes. This year's choice of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who are already prominent figures, raised eyebrows and led to public outcry, especially on social media platforms.

Criticism escalated as ESPN's own on-air host, Pat McAfee, publicly questioned the decision. He expressed frustration with the network's choice, stating that people would infer a connection between Prince Harry and controversial figures.

ESPN responded to the backlash by stating, "You can't please everyone," acknowledging that not everyone will agree with all honorees selected for any award. They emphasized the incredible work of The Invictus Games Foundation as a cause worth celebrating.

While the Invictus Games and the great effort ESPN puts into promoting them are undeniably important, the backlash mainly revolves around two points. First, some argue that it is inappropriate for a non-American, like Prince Harry, to receive an award named after an American soldier like Pat Tillman. Secondly, critics argue that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are already ubiquitous and do not need the additional exposure and recognition that comes with such an award.

ESPN's decision undoubtedly sparked a heated debate among sports fans, military supporters, and the public at large. The Tillman Award controversy serves as a reminder that honoring individuals should be done thoughtfully and considerately, taking into account the values and sentiments associated with the award's namesake.