In a recent article published by Axios, Vice President Kamala Harris' proposed "price gouging" policy has come under fire, with readers on social media accusing the outlet of double standards. Users flagged the inconsistency in Axios' coverage, noting that previous articles from the same author referred to similar policies in other countries as "price controls."

The controversy arose after Axios reporter Emily Peck penned an article titled, "Don't call it price controls: How price gouging bans really work," in which she defended Harris' proposal as not amounting to "Soviet-style price controls." Peck argued that such bans were already in place in various states across the U.S. and would only be triggered during emergencies. However, readers pointed out Peck's previous article on voluntary price controls in the UK, highlighting the apparent inconsistency in the outlet's stance.

One user highlighted a 2023 piece by Peck, which acknowledged the UK's consideration of voluntary price controls on essential food items due to high inflation. The article noted a changing perception of price controls as a means to address economic challenges. Another criticism was directed towards a 2022 article by Axios reporter Matt Phillips, highlighting how price controls were discussed as a way to limit Russia's profits from oil sales during a crisis.

The "Community Notes" function on the platform was used by readers to point out these discrepancies, providing links to the previous articles. The notes specifically flagged the inconsistency in Axios' labeling of similar policies as "price controls" in other contexts, leading to accusations of biased reporting.

Harris had announced her intention to implement a "federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries" as a measure to prevent large corporations from taking advantage of consumers. However, the debate surrounding the proposal has intensified due to the conflicting labeling of the policy as either price controls or measures targeting emergencies.

Axios has yet to respond to requests for comment from Fox News Digital. The controversy highlights the ongoing scrutiny of media outlets and their responsibility to present consistent and accurate information to their readers.

While the arguments surrounding Harris' policy proposal continue, the inconsistency in Axios' coverage has raised questions about journalistic integrity and unbiased reporting, ultimately fueling the ongoing discussion about media credibility in today's digital era.