This comes after Musk previously referred to the firm as "ISIS," drawing attention to their differing recommendations for the electric vehicle (EV) maker.

ISS has a history of diverging opinions from Tesla's loyal supporters, and in 2021, the firm advised removing Kimbal Musk and James Murdoch from the company's board. Elon Musk responded to their suggestions by likening them to the radical Salafi-jihadist terrorist group, ISIS.

Now, in 2024, the stakes are higher than ever as the Tesla shareholder meeting approaches. Musk was initially due to receive the substantial payday, based on performance tranches achieved during his tenure as Tesla's frontman. However, a Delaware Chancery Judge has denied him the enormous sum, potentially leading to significant consequences for Musk and the company.

This year's agenda revolves around the potential aftermath of denying Musk's pay package. It could mark the end of his reign at the electric automaker, possibly affect Tesla's incorporation in Delaware, and even signify a fundamental shift for the company as a whole.

ISS argues that Musk's pay package is deemed excessive, even considering Tesla's success. They contend that the grant did not achieve the board's original objectives of aligning Musk's financial interests with those of Tesla shareholders and focusing his attention solely on the company's interests.

The lack of clarity surrounding Musk's future pay is another concern raised by ISS. Glass Lewis, another advisory firm, has also recommended that shareholders vote against Musk's pay plan.

On the other hand, some argue that Musk is deserving of the substantial sum, asserting that the amount is inconsequential since he had already been awarded it. Egan-Jones, another firm, believes that Musk's leadership and motivation are crucial for Tesla's sustained growth and innovation, making the continuation of this compensation plan vital.

The contrasting viewpoints have sparked a debate among shareholders and industry observers. The outcome of this vote could have far-reaching consequences for Tesla's future trajectory and its relationship with its shareholders.

While the decision ultimately lies in the hands of the shareholders, it remains to be seen how this pivotal moment will shape the future of Tesla and Elon Musk's influence over the company.