9/11 Responders Exposed to Dust and Debris at Higher Risk of Early Onset Dementia, Study Finds

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16253066/original/open-uri20240612-18-1kxibfj?1718216205
ICARO Media Group
News
12/06/2024 18h11

New research led by scientists from Stony Brook University has revealed a concerning link between exposure to dust and debris from the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11 and an increased risk of early onset dementia among responders. The study also emphasizes the importance of protective personal equipment in mitigating this risk in potential future disasters.

Stony Brook University, known for its long-running program focused on treating and monitoring the health of 9/11 responders, played a crucial role in this research. Epidemiologist Sean Clouston and his colleagues specifically concentrated on the long-term mental and cognitive outcomes of these survivors.

Previous studies had established a connection between post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and mild cognitive impairment in this group. However, the researchers noticed that even responders without PTSD were experiencing cognitive problems, leading them to investigate further. Considering the emerging link between air pollution and dementia, the team postulated that exposure to dust and debris could be a significant factor.

To study the cognitive health of middle-aged responders, the scientists examined self-reported accounts from 2014 to 2022, focusing on diagnosed cases of early onset dementia—typically a rare condition before the age of 65. Responders were grouped based on the level of exposure they faced and whether they wore masks or other protective equipment during their efforts.

The outcomes of the study were striking, even surprising the researchers themselves. Among the 5,010 volunteers under the age of 60 who were examined, 228 had been diagnosed with early dementia. The more dust that individuals were exposed to, the higher their odds of developing dementia, even after accounting for other factors like hypertension or head injuries. In fact, those in the most severely exposed group were over nine times more likely to develop dementia compared to the lowest exposure group.

Clouston noted that responders who reported no dust exposure and consistently wore masks had a very low risk of developing dementia. However, for those who reported increasing levels of exposure, the risk of dementia rose incrementally. These findings were published in the journal JAMA Network Open.

While the study established a correlation rather than a direct cause-and-effect relationship, the authors gathered supporting evidence from previous research showing a connection between 9/11 dust exposure and measurable brain markers associated with dementia, such as neuroinflammation. Studies on mice have also demonstrated that exposure to this dust can worsen cognitive health.

This research not only reinforces the understanding that air pollution can be detrimental to the brain but also has implications for other scenarios involving similar types of pollution, such as wildfires reaching buildings and homes.

There are still many unanswered questions, and Clouston's team intends to continue their investigations. They aim to determine if the dementia experienced by 9/11 survivors is biologically distinct, understand how the fine dust particles from the attacks have harmed the brain, and explore the long-term effects on cognitive health as survivors age.

The positive aspect of this study is the potential for lasting changes in equipping first responders and others to handle similar crisis situations. Clouston emphasized the importance of wearing masks, even when the air seems safe, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. By adopting a more cautious approach and providing masks to more individuals in future efforts, the researchers hope to reduce the risk of dementia and other health issues.

The findings from this study serve as a stark reminder of the long-lasting health consequences of major disasters and the importance of taking proactive measures to protect those on the front lines.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related