Experts Advocate for Penicillin Allergy Testing, as Majority of Reported Cases Prove False

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/15937043/original/open-uri20231214-55-1jufu9c?1702584542
ICARO Media Group
News
14/12/2023 19h58

A nationwide push has emerged among allergists and public health officials to challenge the prevalence of reported penicillin allergies in the United States. Recent efforts aim to test patients who claim to be allergic to penicillin in order to determine the validity of their claims and ensure safe use of the antibiotic. According to Dr. Cosby Stone, an assistant professor of allergy and immunology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, the shift from a reactive to a proactive approach reflects a growing willingness to question and assess the accuracy of penicillin allergy claims.

Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that approximately 10% of the U.S. population reports a penicillin allergy. However, further investigation has revealed that less than 1% of these reported cases are truly allergic. Many individuals have been misinformed about their alleged penicillin allergy after developing a rash in their infancy or assuming an allergy due to a family member's history. Dr. Stone emphasizes that some perceived allergies are not allergies at all, and even true allergies tend to fade over time as people grow out of them.

At Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Dr. Stone and his team are leading the charge in testing patients who have been labeled as penicillin-allergic. Under controlled conditions, individuals are administered a small dose of penicillin and closely monitored for any adverse reactions. Out of every 100 individuals tested, only one typically exhibits a reaction. Although some responses can be severe, most reactions manifest as mild side effects such as rashes, diarrhea, or nausea—conditions often mistaken for an allergy. Dr. Gerald Volcheck, chair of allergic diseases at the Mayo Clinic, deems these side effects as manageable and unrelated to true penicillin allergies.

In recent years, the practice of testing for true penicillin allergies has gained support nationwide, with a growing movement to "delabel" individuals who falsely claim to be allergic. While there is no official national guidance for penicillin delabeling, the CDC closely monitors these efforts and encourages individuals to seek testing. By eliminating false penicillin allergies, treatment options expand for patients, leading to reduced reliance on ineffective antibiotics. Melinda Neuhauser, a pharmacist and acute care lead for the CDC's Office of Antibiotic Stewardship, highlights the importance of eliminating false allergies, as it prevents unnecessary antibiotic use that contributes to antimicrobial resistance.

It is crucial to find alternative antibiotic options for patients with penicillin allergies, as non-allergic individuals often receive broad-spectrum antibiotics that may be less effective. These broad-spectrum antibiotics are typically reserved as a last-resort measure for severe bacterial infections. However, extended use of these antibiotics can inadvertently facilitate the growth of stronger bacteria, which in turn develop resistance to the drugs that would otherwise be effective against them.

Claire Woerner, a resident of Hendersonville, Tennessee, recently discovered through testing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center that her lifelong penicillin allergy diagnosis was inaccurate. Though her mother witnessed her covered "head to toe" in hives after taking penicillin at 18 months old, subsequent penicillin tests revealed no negative reaction. Woerner's misdiagnosis resulted in a limited array of antibiotic options, which posed challenges for treating her recurrent sinus infections. As someone with asthma and a higher risk for pneumonia, the wrong antibiotics jeopardized Woerner's health.

Vanderbilt's penicillin testing approach varies depending on the patient's history with the antibiotic. Those reporting a childhood rash after taking penicillin are given an oral tablet of amoxicillin and monitored for up to 90 minutes. Patients who previously experienced severe reactions undergo a more extensive testing process involving skin pricks, intradermal injections, and finally, the administration of an amoxicillin tablet if no reactions occur.

As the medical community continues to emphasize the importance of accurate penicillin allergy identification, efforts like those at Vanderbilt University Medical Center aim to ensure that individuals receive appropriate treatments and avoid unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. The realization of false penicillin allergies opens up new possibilities for patients, reduces reliance on ineffective antibiotics, and contributes to the global fight against antimicrobial resistance.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related