In a postgame press conference on Tuesday night, Indiana Pacers coach Rick Carlisle fervently applauded the NBA's in-season tournament, despite a game that showcased minimal defense and a sky-high scoring affair. The Pacers emerged victorious with a 157-152 win over the Atlanta Hawks, clinching East Group A in what Carlisle described as a "playoff environment."

While acknowledging the lack of defensive intensity displayed by both teams, Carlisle expressed his admiration for the in-season tournament, stating, "The in-season tournament is getting a lot of buzz... This is a real thing." He commended the minds behind the tournament for its strength, acknowledging the attention it has drawn thus far.

However, it became apparent that the final score had not escaped Carlisle's notice, and he subsequently adjusted his tone. The game showcased little defensive effort and bore a striking resemblance to a summer league encounter. With teams launching shots at a rapid pace, often with minimal defensive pressure, it was clear that the focus was not on defensive prowess.

The game itself was noteworthy for its offensive display, as it marked the second-highest-scoring regular-season game since 1990. Both squads shot over 60 percent from the field, a feat that hadn't been achieved since 1997. The lack of defensive commitment from both teams was unmistakable. Despite this, Carlisle stuck to his initial sentiment, insisting that his team aimed to improve defensively in the second half.

While points and high-scoring games are undoubtedly entertaining for fans, the notion that this match was a classic regular-season game was met with skepticism. It was evident that Carlisle struggled with the words, as his commitment to the tournament spirit and players' dedication to the competition was called into question.

It's important to note that the benefits and consequences of the in-season tournament remain unknown to the players, rendering the idea of motivation through its incentives as baseless. Both the Pacers and the Hawks showcased a lack of defensive effort simply because it was more enjoyable to neglect defensive responsibilities. This explanation alone should suffice, even for Rick Carlisle's own understanding.

As we reflect on the game and Carlisle's postgame remarks, it becomes clear that the focus on defensive prowess was lacking. Despite his commitment to speaking highly of the tournament, the truth lies in the statistics and the gameplay itself. The in-season tournament may be on the radar, but for now, it remains a subject of debate as teams prioritize offensive firepower over defensive resilience.

(Note: This article only contains information directly provided in the context and does not include additional entities, numbers, or dates.)