The highly anticipated clash between the Vancouver Whitecaps and Cruz Azul in Mexico City raises discussions about the new single-game format of the Concacaf Champions Cup, which is now in its second year. The recent results have seen an MLS team traveling for the final, stirring up mixed reactions.

Critics argue that this format, similar to the Leagues Cup, Gold Cup, Nations League, All-Star Game, and Campeones Cup, may not provide an ideal platform for fair competition. The transition from a more traditional two-leg final to a single-game format has been met with differing opinions among fans.

While some believe that the one-game final format is a fixable problem that provides a more decisive outcome, others remain loyal to the two-leg final tradition. Concerns about the dominance of Mexican teams and the strategic advantage gained from this format continue to be discussed within the MLS and broader soccer community.

Notably, comments mentioned that criticism of the format often intensifies when a Mexican team emerges victorious, hinting at underlying biases and frustrations surrounding the competition's structure. Additionally, some fans argue that the main issue lies in MLS team salaries and the financial disparities compared to Liga MX clubs, impacting their ability to compete at the highest level.

As the discussion around the Concacaf Champions Cup's format continues, opinions vary on whether the current setup benefits the competition's integrity or if adjustments are necessary to level the playing field for all participating teams. The debate underscores the ongoing efforts to refine and enhance the continental tournament to ensure an equitable and captivating experience for fans and players alike.