Wisconsin Supreme Court to Decide on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Ballot Presence

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16353732/original/open-uri20240920-18-ebt0sm?1726871218
ICARO Media Group
Politics
20/09/2024 21h55

The Wisconsin Supreme Court is set to make a pivotal decision on whether Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s name will remain on the fall presidential ballot. Despite suspending his campaign in August and endorsing former President Donald Trump, Kennedy has been pursuing to remove his name from battleground states while allowing supporters to continue backing him in regions where his votes may not significantly impact the outcome. Notably, his presence on the ballot has been differing across states, with the North Carolina Supreme Court ruling against his inclusion, while the Michigan Supreme Court and a federal judge in Detroit upheld his name on the ballot.

Recently, Kennedy filed a lawsuit in Wisconsin on September 3 to request the removal of his name from the ballot. However, a Dane County judge ruled that candidates must remain on the ballot unless they pass away. In response to the escalating legal battle, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has decided to bypass the appeals court and handle the matter directly. The justices plan to review briefs and likely issue a decision without conducting oral arguments, emphasizing the necessity for a prompt resolution due to the ongoing distribution of absentee ballots featuring Kennedy's name by election clerks.

Legal representatives for the Wisconsin Elections Commission have urged for a speedy resolution, citing concerns over the inclusion of Kennedy's name on absentee ballots that have already been dispatched. The court has committed to expeditiously addressing the matter, underscoring the significance of ensuring clarity on Kennedy's ballot presence ahead of the imminent presidential election. This development signifies a critical juncture in the ongoing debate surrounding the eligibility of candidates on electoral ballots and highlights the pressing need for a decisive ruling from the Wisconsin Supreme Court in the coming days.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related