**Debate Erupts Over Trump’s Proposed Tariffs and Congressional Approval**

President-elect Donald Trump has reignited the conversation on U.S. tariffs with his proposal to implement hefty levies on imports. Trump, who has proudly embraced the moniker "Tariff Man," suggested imposing tariffs ranging from 10% to 20% on all imports into the United States. His plan also includes specific tariffs, such as a 60% tariff on Chinese imports and a staggering 200% tariff on vehicles from Mexico.

A significant point of contention is whether Trump can enforce these tariffs without needing Congress to sign off. Key voices in the debate include Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., one of three lawmakers aiming to succeed Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-KY, as Senate majority leader. On "Sunday Morning Futures" airing on Fox News, Scott expressed his belief that Trump would probably require Congressional approval. Scott elaborated that achieving this might necessitate a 60-vote threshold in the Senate, unless it could be managed through reconciliation, which only needs a simple majority of 51 votes. Reconciliation is a legislative process used to expedite tax and spending bills and avoid a filibuster.

The power dynamics in Congress further complicate the matter. Control of the House of Representatives, which is essential for passing such legislation, remains uncertain. As these discussions unfold, economic and legal experts weigh in with their perspectives. Alan Wolff, a former deputy director-general of the World Trade Organization, has opined that Trump lacks the authority to unilaterally impose these tariffs.

However, the debate is far from settled. Jason Furman, a Harvard University professor and former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers during the Obama administration, mentioned on CNBC that Trump might leverage national security arguments or other legal avenues to attempt implementing these tariffs. Nonetheless, Furman acknowledged that such actions would likely lead to prolonged court battles.

Overall, Trump’s tariff proposal has triggered significant debate over the extent of presidential power vs. congressional approval, with implications that could profoundly impact international trade relations and the American economy.