In a heated presidential debate, both candidates made statements that are now generating controversy and raising concerns about the state of public discourse. The focus shifted to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as Joe Biden emphasized his commitment to a ceasefire and Donald Trump made contentious remarks regarding Palestinians.

Biden reiterated his efforts to push for a ceasefire deal, expressing concern for innocent civilians in populated areas. He assured voters that his administration is providing Israel with necessary weapons and support, stating, "We are the biggest producer of support for Israel than anyone in the world."

Trump, on the other hand, displayed skepticism toward the creation of an independent Palestinian state as a means of achieving peace in the region. When asked about supporting such a state, he replied, "I'd have to see," before delving into his concerns with NATO.

Trump's closing statement was marked by inflammatory rhetoric. He blamed Biden for a range of issues while also targeting Palestinians, stating, "We have the Palestinians and we have everybody else rioting all over the place." He went on to compare anti-war demonstrations and student protests to the neo-Nazi rally in Charlottesville, claiming that the current situation was far worse.

Furthermore, Trump's comments extended beyond the Palestinian conflict. He made disparaging remarks about immigrants, falsely claiming that they were entering the country from "prisons, jails, and mental institutions" and were responsible for an unprecedented level of violence. He also suggested that immigrants were taking jobs from Black and Hispanic individuals.

These comments are not new for Trump, who has a history of making controversial statements. From suggesting that Barack Obama was secretly a Muslim to making derogatory remarks about Mexican immigrants during his 2016 campaign, Trump's rhetoric has consistently sparked outrage and debate.

The debate has prompted discussions about whether another candidate, besides Biden, would be better equipped to address such divisive language. However, some prominent Democrats have thus far been unwilling to entertain the notion of replacing Biden. Many fear that repeating the mistakes of the 2016 election, when Trump emerged victorious despite concerns about his demeanor, could lead to a similar outcome.

In addition, there is growing scrutiny of the media's approach in treating Trump's divisive rhetoric as the norm rather than an exception. Some argue that this normalization contributes to a dangerous erosion of civility and decency in public discourse.

As the election approaches, voters and analysts are closely observing the candidates' statements and their implications for the future of the nation. Both candidates are now grappling with the consequences of their words, as the public considers the impact of their rhetoric on national unity and international relations.