In a troubling display of unwavering confidence in his own authority, former President Donald Trump has once again asserted his belief in the limitless power of the presidency. Trump's candid remarks in a recent interview on Fox News have raised concerns among legal experts and critics alike, who argue that his views pose a threat to American democracy.

Trump's statements have brought to light a pattern of disregard for constitutional norms and an alarming disregard for the will of the voters. Despite previous claims from apologists that his controversial speeches contain hidden meanings, Trump's words have often been straightforward and unambiguous. Whether it be calling for the "termination" of the Constitution or expressing a desire to be a dictator, Trump has left little room for interpretation.

The culmination of Trump's alarming rhetoric was witnessed on January 6, 2021, when he urged his supporters to march on the U.S. Capitol, refusing to accept the results of a free and fair election. As chaos unfolded and the Capitol was ransacked, it became evident that Trump's intentions extended far beyond mere political maneuvering. Special counsel Jack Smith recently re-indicted Trump and his allies over their attempts to hold onto power through mob violence and fake electors, further solidifying the gravity of the situation.

However, a Supreme Court ruling earlier this summer granting former presidents presumed and absolute immunity for their "official" acts has emboldened Trump. This new indictment by Smith seeks to reframe Trump's actions as those of a desperate candidate for office rather than a sitting president. Whether this approach will be accepted by the Supreme Court, which is now predominantly conservative, remains to be seen.

Trump's brazen admission of guilt, coupled with his justification that he is entitled to interfere in presidential elections, has alarmed legal experts who argue that there is no such right. Critics point out that Trump's assertion is simply a veiled attempt to override the will of the voters and claim victory in an election he lost. The notion that anyone other than Trump engaging in similar interference would face prosecution only adds fuel to the fire.

While some legal experts reject Trump's belief in unchecked presidential power, others fear that his influence within the Republican Party, bolstered by a conservative-leaning Supreme Court, gives legitimacy to his audacious claims. The idea of an "inalienable right to steal elections" has been met with criticism from political science professors and legal scholars who reject the idea that Trump can act with impunity.

As the legal battles unfold and the November elections approach, the impact of Trump's words will reverberate. Should Trump prevail and win, many worry about the potential consequences for those he has accused of election interference. On the other hand, if he is to face sentencing for his actions, the transcript of his recent interview may serve as crucial evidence in the hands of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who aims to hold Trump accountable for his alleged felonies.

This ongoing saga continues to polarize American society, with Trump's unfaltering belief in his own power challenging the very foundations of democracy. The ultimate test will come when six conservative justices on the Supreme Court determine whether Trump's actions merit the new immunity doctrine or if accountability must prevail. American democracy hangs delicately in the balance as the nation grapples with the consequences of a presidency marked by an ever-increasing vision of unfettered power.