Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action Shows Impact on Racial Diversity at Selective Colleges

ICARO Media Group
Politics
30/08/2024 21h57

Amherst College and Tufts University, in particular, have witnessed a notable decline in the representation of Black students among their incoming classes. These numbers, along with data from the University of Virginia and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), provide early evidence of the potential repercussions of the ruling.

According to data released by Amherst College, the share of Black students in this year's entering class dropped by eight percentage points. Tufts University also experienced a moderate decrease in the percentage of Black students. The University of Virginia saw a slight dip as well. These findings align with last week's report from MIT, which announced a significant decline in Black enrollment by 10 percentage points.

Amherst College's data further revealed a sharp rise in the percentage of white students enrolling, along with a slight increase in the representation of Asian American students. At Tufts, white student enrollment rose, while the percentage of Asian American students remained relatively stable. Hispanic student enrollment declined at both Amherst and MIT, but increased slightly at Tufts and the University of Virginia. The overall picture is still murky, as many highly selective universities have yet to release their incoming class statistics.

The Supreme Court ruling has disrupted decades of admissions practices, causing concern among proponents of affirmative action who warned of its immediate negative impact on diversity, with potential ripple effects on society as a whole. The ruling prohibits admissions officers from considering race unless it is mentioned organically, such as in a college essay.

Matthew L. McGann, Amherst's admissions dean, addressed the effects of the court's ruling in communications with the class of 2028 and the broader Amherst community. He acknowledged that the incoming class was not as racially diverse as previous classes, pointing out that other institutions have experienced similar impacts. McGann emphasized that all colleges and universities are evaluating the outcomes of this first admission cycle under the new legal standard.

Amherst College saw a dramatic drop in the percentage of Black students, from 11% last year to just 3% this year. Additionally, Tufts University witnessed a decline from 7.3% to 4.7%. The University of Virginia's Black student enrollment decreased from 7.9% to 7%. Concurrently, white student enrollment rose at Amherst and Tufts, while there was a minor decline in Asian student enrollment at both institutions.

Richard Sander, an expert in admissions data and law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, suggested that the impact on Hispanic students may be less significant than on Black students. Historically, admissions offices have given less preference to Hispanic students, and the Hispanic college-age population has grown relative to white students.

MIT's data revealed a substantial decrease in Black student representation, accompanied by a significant increase in Asian American students. This trend aligns with the argument made by critics of affirmative action who claim that the drop in racial diversity will be temporary, as universities seek alternative methods to achieve diversity, such as socioeconomic status.

The University of Virginia, a public institution, has implemented partnerships with low-income public schools statewide to enhance recruitment efforts. Experts, including Justin Driver from Yale Law School, suggest that this approach could serve as a potential model for other universities looking to maintain diversity within the confines of the court's ruling.

However, concerns remain about the ability of college admissions offices to navigate the ruling without compromising diversity. Without innovative strategies, there is a fear that colleges may witness a lost generation of Black students. Emory University in Georgia, another selective institution, reported only slight changes in the racial makeup of its freshman class, indicating that the impact of the ruling can vary among schools.

Amherst College, known for its outreach to Black students, expressed these concerns in a court brief last year, warning that a race-blind admissions policy would result in a significant reduction in the percentage of Black, Hispanic, and Native American students.

Amherst's commitment to diversity remains unwavering, and the institution plans to explore new strategies to recruit a diverse student body. The college's president, Michael A. Elliott, expressed concern about the potential impact on the sense of belonging for current students. The drop in demographic population on a small campus could fundamentally change the experience for those affected.

Tufts University's dean of admissions, Joseph Duck, cautioned against drawing hasty conclusions from the data, noting that different ways of presenting the information can yield varying interpretations. He emphasized the ongoing examination of data to understand the factors contributing to changes in different student groups.

As more colleges release their admission numbers, the true extent of the Supreme Court ruling's impact on racial diversity in higher education will become apparent. For now, the decline in Black student enrollment suggests that careful consideration and innovative approaches are necessary to ensure continued diversity within the constraints of the new legal standard.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related