Jackson voiced her concerns, stating that the ruling appeared to afford Trump special treatment, creating a disparity between his treatment and that of others within the criminal justice system.

Justice Jackson's interview with "CBS Evening News" marked her first broadcast appearance since joining the Supreme Court. The timing aligned with the upcoming release of her memoir, titled "Lovely One," which will be available to the public on Tuesday.

The Supreme Court's decision, which was issued in July, displayed a clear ideological division, with the six Republican-appointed justices concluding that former presidents enjoy broad legal protection against charges related to their official duties. However, the court rejected Trump's argument of absolute immunity unless impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate.

In her dissent, Justice Jackson emphasized the unprecedented nature of the ruling, stating that the court had firmly established the notion that the most powerful official in the United States could, under certain circumstances yet to be fully determined, act as a "law unto himself."

The outcome of this decision has effectively stalled special counsel Jack Smith's case against Trump, which accuses the former president of obstructing the peaceful transfer of power following the 2020 election. In response, Smith filed a superseding indictment on Tuesday, narrowing the allegations based on the conduct that the Supreme Court deemed to be immune from prosecution.

When questioned about her readiness to address cases related to the upcoming election before the Supreme Court, Justice Jackson asserted that she is as prepared as anyone could be. Recognizing the legal issues stemming from the political process, she emphasized the responsibility of the Supreme Court to handle such matters if necessary.

As the nation continues to grapple with the implications of the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity, the interview with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson provides insight into the concerns surrounding the unequal treatment of individuals within the criminal justice system. The repercussions of this decision and its future impact on accountability for presidential acts will undoubtedly be subjects of ongoing discussion and debate.