Supreme Court Denies Mark Meadows' Request to Move Georgia Election Case to Federal Court
ICARO Media Group
### Supreme Court Blocks Mark Meadows' Effort to Move Georgia Election Case to Federal Court
In a crucial decision, the Supreme Court has denied Mark Meadows, former White House Chief of Staff, his request to transfer the Georgia election interference case against him to federal court. This case alleges that Meadows was part of a conspiracy to maintain Donald Trump’s presidency following his loss in the 2020 election.
Meadows is among 19 individuals indicted in Georgia for their involvement in this purported scheme. Both Meadows and Trump, who was also charged, have maintained their innocence. Trump's recent re-election complicates the possibility of a trial while he remains in office. Meadows' attorney, George Terwilliger, expressed confidence that Meadows will be cleared of the charges in state court.
The case against Meadows is currently paused after an appeals court opted to review whether Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis should be removed due to a personal relationship with the special prosecutor assigned to the case. Meanwhile, Meadows argued that the charges pertain to his responsibilities as a federal official and should be heard in federal court. He cited a Supreme Court decision that grants Trump broad immunity from criminal prosecution to underpin this argument.
Meadows' attorneys contended that the charges stem from actions linked to his duties as Chief of Staff, especially emphasizing that federal immunity should influence what evidence is admissible. Conversely, prosecutors argue that Meadows failed to prove he was executing official duties during the alleged activities, such as his participation in a phone call where Trump suggested Georgia's Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, should help "find" the votes needed to overturn the state's election result.
Both a U.S. district judge and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals previously decided that the case should stay in Georgia’s jurisdiction. Prosecutors insisted that Meadows can present his federal defenses in state court and dismissed concerns about potential widespread prosecutions of federal officials.
Additionally, the Supreme Court has previously denied a similar request from Meadows regarding a separate fake elector case in Arizona. So far, four individuals have pleaded guilty in the Georgia election interference case, while the remaining 15, including Trump and Meadows, maintain their not guilty pleas.