In a recent episode of his show, Fox News host Sean Hannity has come under scrutiny for propagating a debunked myth surrounding the hush-money trial involving former President Donald Trump. During the Friday night broadcast, Hannity discussed a peculiar letter sent by Judge Juan Merchan to the attorneys involved in the case regarding a social media post from May 29. The post, shared on the New York State Unified Court System Facebook page by someone claiming to be a juror's cousin, touted Trump's impending conviction.

However, the veracity of the post was quickly dismantled, as the individual behind it identified themselves on the social media platform as a "professional shitposter," thereby undermining its credibility. Despite its debunking, Hannity proceeded to give weight to the content of the post, suggesting a potential rigged trial and raising questions about a possible mistrial.

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett joined Hannity in presenting arguments to support the validity of the post. Jarrett pointed out that it hinted at jurors' preconceived notions and lack of impartiality, a crucial element in ensuring a fair trial. Hannity expressed his lack of trust in Judge Merchan, adding further fuel to the already contentious situation.

Social media users swiftly criticized Hannity for taking the post seriously, mocking his continued focus on the debunked myth. Twitter user @XUser wrote, "Watching Sean Hannity babble about the 'cousin post' hours after it was debunked is funny. MAGA got punked, and they're so big mad about it." Another user chastised Hannity for not verifying the facts, tweeting, "@seanhannity HEY MORON, IT WAS A HOAX. The shitposter who put that up there got you, and a few others too. Maybe you have a department at work whose job is to confirm facts?"

Even lawyer George Conway, the ex-husband of Trump consultant Kellyanne Conway, chimed in on the post's legitimacy, sarcastically labeling it as "totally legit" with an eye-rolling emoji.

While the trial itself remains the subject of public interest and debate, Hannity's endorsement of a debunked myth has only intensified the conversation surrounding the proceedings. The importance of accuracy and reliable sources in journalism has once again been highlighted, urging media personalities to exercise caution in amplifying unverified claims.

As the controversy unfolds, it remains to be seen whether Hannity and other pundits will retract their statements or seek to rectify the situation. Regardless, the spotlight on the hush-money trial and its associated narratives shows no signs of dimming anytime soon.