In a landmark decision, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled against the Statewide Virtual Charter School Board's contract with St. Isidore of Seville Virtual Catholic Charter School. The ruling states that publicly funded religious charter schools violate Oklahoma statutes, the state constitution, and the Establishment Clause.

The controversy began in June 2023 when the Statewide Virtual Charter School Board approved a contract with St. Isidore. However, Attorney General Gentner Drummond filed a lawsuit against the board and its members, arguing that the school's contract with the state made it a public entity, thereby blurring the line between church and state.

The Supreme Court's conclusion emphasized that charter schools in Oklahoma must be nonsectarian, but St. Isidore's curriculum includes the evangelization of the Catholic faith. The court deemed this as a violation of state and federal laws, as well as unconstitutional.

Drummond expressed satisfaction with the ruling, stating that it was a victory for religious liberty. He emphasized that the state should not sponsor any religion, ensuring that taxpayer dollars would not fund teachings that oppose individuals' faith.

During the court proceedings, Philip Sechler, counsel for the State Virtual Charter School Board, pointed out that some religious institutions receive public funding for providing public services, such as religious hospitals. However, Drummond argued that the provision of free public education is a legal requirement in Oklahoma and should not come at an added cost to families.

The principal of St. Isidore, in response to the ruling, expressed disappointment for the potential students and families who sought the educational experience that the virtual Catholic charter school offered. They maintained hope that the court's decision could be corrected in the future, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling the needs of all Oklahoma students and families.

The ruling has generated widespread debate over the extent to which religious schools should receive public funding. Supporters argue that it infringes on religious freedom, while critics assert that public funds should be used exclusively for secular education.

As this is a developing story, further updates may follow.