Members of the New York City Council have raised serious doubts regarding the suitability of Randy Mastro, former federal prosecutor and aide to Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, for the role of corporation counsel. The contentious nomination hearing, held on Tuesday, showcased the deep divisions between the Council and Mayor Eric Adams over Mastro's appointment. While Mastro is known for his aggressive legal tactics, some council members expressed concerns about his past clients and whether he could impartially represent the city's interests.

At the heart of the Council's objections lay their skepticism about Mayor Adams' decision to choose Mastro as corporation counsel, responsible for providing legal representation to the city and its agencies, as well as representing the mayor in civil litigation. The timing of the nomination raised eyebrows, as it coincided with a lawsuit accusing Mayor Adams of sexually assaulting a woman in Florida several decades ago under the state's Adult Survivors Act.

Adrienne Adams, the City Council speaker, emphasized the need for the corporation counsel to faithfully represent all citizens and prioritize justice and equity. She questioned whether Mastro could fulfill these expectations, citing his history of representing clients whose interests clashed with the city's long-term institutional well-being. Adams, who has accused the mayor of encroaching on the Council's legislative powers, expressed concerns about Mastro's ability to uphold the principles of justice and equality.

In his defense, Mastro vehemently rejected the criticisms leveled against his legal background and ethical standing. He highlighted his pro bono work for marginalized communities, such as the homeless, protestors seeking justice for George Floyd, and members of the LGBTQ+ community. Mastro also pointed to his efforts in dismantling mob control of the Fulton Fish Market, even in the face of death threats. He stressed his obligation to fight for his clients and challenged the notion that he would simply serve as the mayor's personal attorney.

When questioned about representing the mayor in the sexual assault lawsuit, Mastro cautiously responded that it depended on a thorough review of the case. He expressed the need to consider all aspects before making an informed decision. Throughout the lengthy questioning, Mastro became visibly frustrated, often raising his voice and using emphatic gestures.

One sticking point during the hearing was Mastro's past work, which appeared to conflict with the city's interests. Notably, his representation of the State of New Jersey in a lawsuit against the federal government over congestion pricing, his defense of Chevron amidst pollution allegations in the Ecuadorean rainforest, and his role as legal counsel for former New Jersey governor Chris Christie during the investigation of George Washington Bridge lane closings drew criticism from Council members.

Diana Ayala, the deputy speaker of the City Council, raised concerns about Mastro's moral character and tactics. However, in response, Mastro argued that the Council failed to understand the complexities and nuance of the cases he had worked on. He emphasized his commitment to civil rights, constitutional rights, and racial justice. According to him, his track record of over 30 years demonstrated his dedication to these principles.

Despite significant opposition from Council factions, including the Black Latino and Asian Caucus and the Progressive Caucus, Mayor Adams has stood by his nominee. The mayor's lobbying efforts included extensive meetings between Mastro and Council members. However, the tenor of the nomination hearing suggests that the opposition may be too significant to overcome.

The final decision on Mastro's nomination rests with the 51-member City Council, who will vote next month. Mastro, if approved, would replace Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, who left her position in May amidst reported legal disagreements with the Adams administration. In the interim, Muriel Goode-Trufant serves as the acting corporation counsel.

During a press conference, Mayor Adams praised Mastro as a "great" New Yorker and lawyer, expressing pride in having him represent the city. However, the final determination lies with the City Council.

As investigations swirl around the Adams administration, many question whether the city needs a combative and aggressive lawyer like Mastro, or if a more measured approach is necessary. Nonetheless, Mayor Adams believes that a competent attorney is essential, regardless of the challenges an administration faces.