Montana Supreme Court Rules Minors Do Not Need Parental Consent for Abortion

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16321660/original/open-uri20240814-18-15gaqxl?1723677381
ICARO Media Group
Politics
14/08/2024 23h11

In a significant decision, Montana's Supreme Court has ruled that minors do not require their parents' consent to undergo an abortion in the state. The ruling upholds a previous lower court decision that deemed the parental consent law unconstitutional, citing the privacy clause within Montana's constitution.

Justice Laurie McKinnon, author of the unanimous opinion, stated, "We conclude that minors, like adults, have a fundamental right to privacy, which includes procreative autonomy and making medical decisions affecting his or her bodily integrity and health in partnership with a chosen health care provider free from governmental interest."

The decision arrives as Montana prepares for a potential ballot initiative in November, which aims to protect the right to pre-viability abortions within the state constitution. Supporters of this initiative have reportedly gathered enough signatures for verification by county officials. The Secretary of State's Office is expected to certify the general election ballots by August 22nd.

The controversial parental consent law was passed by the Legislature in 2013 but was never implemented due to an injunction agreed upon by the attorney general at the time. A series of judicial substitutions, recusals, and retirements delayed a definitive ruling until last year.

In February 2023, a state judge declared the parental consent law unconstitutional based on a 1999 Montana Supreme Court ruling that recognized the right to privacy as encompassing the right to a pre-viability abortion by the patient's chosen provider.

Planned Parenthood, which challenged the law, welcomed the Supreme Court's decision. Martha Fuller, the organization's president and CEO, expressed her satisfaction, stating, "affirms the right to privacy and we are pleased that the Court upheld the fundamental rights of Montanans today."

The state had argued for the necessity of the parental consent law, citing reasons such as protecting minors from sexual victimization, ensuring post-abortion care monitoring by parents, preventing poorly reasoned decisions by minors, and safeguarding parental rights over their children's medical care.

However, the justices disagreed with these arguments, emphasizing that the state imposes no similar limitations on minors seeking medical or surgical care related to pregnancy or their child.

Governor Greg Gianforte expressed his concerns and disappointment with the ruling, stating, "I am concerned and disappointed with this decision, which states parents do not have a fundamental right to oversee the medical care of their young daughters."

As it stands, 36 states across the United States require some form of parental involvement in a minor's decision to have an abortion, according to data from the Guttmacher Institute, a policy organization advocating for sexual and reproductive health care rights. Some states mandate notification, while others require both notification and consent from parents.

Montana's Supreme Court decision marks a significant milestone in upholding reproductive rights for minors within the state. As November approaches, the potential ballot initiative will be closely watched, as it could further solidify abortion rights within Montana's constitution.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related