****

In the deliberations over the GOP’s ambitious domestic-policy bill, attention is pivoting to a group of Senate Republicans known as the “Medicaid moderates.” This faction, diverse in ideology and hailing from states as varied as Missouri, Maine, and West Virginia, is uniting over shared apprehensions regarding the bill's potential impact on Medicaid, the national safety-net health program.

Missouri's conservative Senator Josh Hawley and Maine's centrist Senator Susan Collins are leading this charge. Alongside them, Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Jerry Moran of Kansas, and Jim Justice of West Virginia have made it clear they have serious reservations about the House-passed version of the bill, which the Congressional Budget Office estimates could result in 10.3 million people losing Medicaid coverage.

These senators' concerns are significant for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who can afford to lose only three GOP senators on this crucial vote, presuming Vice President JD Vance would break a tie. With Kentucky Senator Rand Paul almost certainly opposing the bill if it includes a debt limit increase, and Wisconsin’s Ron Johnson voicing fiscal objections, the Medicaid moderates' support becomes even more critical.

President Donald Trump has added an influential voice, urging Republicans to minimize changes to Medicaid. Hawley recounted a conversation with Trump, wherein the president categorically opposed any cuts to Medicaid benefits. This alignment with Trump puts additional pressure on the bill’s architects.

Balancing fiscal conservatives' demands with the Medicaid moderates’ requirements will not be easy. Thune and Mike Crapo, Chair of the Finance Committee, acknowledge that Medicaid will be a contentious issue. With roughly 80 million low-income Americans depending on it, they aim to reform the program without compromising beneficiaries.

Crapo supports the House bill's work requirements for Medicaid but notes the challenge of crafting a solution acceptable to the entire 53-member GOP caucus. Concerns among moderates like Collins, Moran, and Justice focus particularly on provisions like provider taxes, which states use to finance Medicaid costs, and expedited work requirement implementations.

Senators Moran and Justice have highlighted the risk to rural hospitals, while Collins has expressed similar worries. Meanwhile, Murkowski, although less affected by provider tax concerns due to Alaska’s unique funding structures, finds the House's approach to work requirements unrealistic for her state.

As the Medicaid moderates insist on amendments, fiscal conservatives push for more stringent cuts, further complicating negotiations. The provider tax remains a controversial element, with some senators deeming it a misuse of funds needing reform.

Ultimately, the alignment of Medicaid moderates with President Trump and the need for significant yet broadly acceptable revisions point to a complex road ahead. The outcome of these negotiations will significantly shape the Senate’s version of the GOP’s sweeping domestic policy bill.