In a controversial revelation, Kristi Noem, a potential running mate for former President Donald Trump, has come under fire after admitting to killing a dog on her farm. The South Dakota governor recounted the incident in her upcoming memoir, titled "No Going Back: The Truth on What's Wrong with Politics and How We Move America Forward," according to a report by The Guardian.

The dog in question, named "Cricket," was a 14-month-old wirehaired pointer who, according to Noem, displayed aggressive behavior. The incident took place during a pheasant-hunting trip when Cricket became overly excited and later attacked another family's chickens. Noem claimed that when she tried to intervene, the dog bit her.

In an excerpt from her book, Noem expressed her strong aversion to the dog, labeling it as "dangerous" and "less than worthless" as a hunting companion. She concluded that euthanizing Cricket was the only viable option.

Animal welfare organizations swiftly condemned Noem's actions, criticizing her for resorting to lethal measures instead of seeking alternatives. Wayne Pacelle, president of Animal Wellness Action, expressed disbelief, stating that there was no valid justification for shooting a juvenile dog due to normal puppy-like behavior. Colleen O'Brien, senior vice president at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), criticized Noem for not attempting to train the dog or find a more responsible guardian.

Democrats seized the opportunity to denounce Noem, using the incident as an example of the "extreme and dangerous" nature of Trump and his allies. The Democratic National Committee released a statement calling for voters to reject elected officials who "brag about brutally killing their pets."

Defending her decision, Noem took to social media to explain that difficult decisions like this were a common occurrence in the life of a farmer. She cited a recent incident where she had to euthanize three horses that had been part of her family for 25 years.

The controversy surrounding Noem's admission has reignited debates regarding animal welfare and responsible pet ownership. Critics argue that taking the life of an animal should always be a last resort, and that alternatives such as training and rehoming should be explored.

As the news makes headlines, it remains to be seen whether this incident will have any lasting impact on Noem's political aspirations or public perception.