Kansas Governor Vetoes Bill Banning Gender-Affirming Care for Minors, Setting Up Showdown with Republican Legislature
ICARO Media Group
In a move that sets the stage for a potential confrontation, the Democratic Governor of Kansas, Laura Kelly, has vetoed a controversial bill that aimed to ban gender-affirming care for minors. The bill, known as Senate Bill 233, sought to prohibit hormone therapy, puberty blockers, and gender reassignment surgery for individuals under the age of 18.
Governor Kelly's veto puts her at odds with the state's Republican supermajority, which is widely expected to attempt an override. The Republican-led legislature has been increasingly pushing for measures that restrict transgender care, with Kansas hoping to join more than a dozen other states with similar legislation.
Carrie Rahfaldt, a spokeswoman for Kansas House Speaker Dan Hawkins, revealed that the Senate is expected to hold a vote on the potential override after the veto session begins on April 29. To override the veto, two-thirds of the Senate will need to vote in favor, while the House also requires a two-thirds majority.
House Republicans, who strongly support the bill, expressed their determination to override the veto and protect what they perceive as vulnerable Kansas children. However, the success of the vote depends on attendance in the part-time legislature, as absences could impact the number of votes needed for an override.
Governor Kelly justified her veto by emphasizing the importance of parental rights. She argued that the bill infringed upon those rights and imposed unnecessary government mandates on a small group of Kansans. She emphasized the delicate nature of a parent's role in making decisions about their children's medical care and expressed concern about the potential harm the bill could cause.
House Republican leadership criticized the veto, claiming that it positioned Governor Kelly on the "wrong side of history" and dismissed it as reckless. Last year, Kelly vetoed four other bills that imposed restrictions on transgender individuals, but Republicans were able to override three of those vetoes.
The proposed legislation is part of a larger trend across the nation, with a record number of bills targeting transgender people being introduced in state legislatures. Over 500 anti-LGBTQ+ bills have been introduced during the 2024 legislative session alone, according to data compiled by the American Civil Liberties Union.
Several major medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association, and the Endocrine Society, have come out in opposition to restrictions on gender-affirming care. They argue that such care is medically necessary for transgender children.
Advocacy organizations have raised alarm about the potential consequences of the bill, warning that it could harm vulnerable Kansas children and their families. They argue that the broad reach of the legislation could impact various spaces such as schools, therapist offices, and state agencies, potentially affecting anyone providing support or services to children in those locations.
Don Haider-Markel, a political science professor at the University of Kansas, predicts that if the bill becomes law, it could prompt parents of transgender children to leave the state in search of essential medical care.
The stage is now set for a high-stakes battle between Governor Kelly and the Republican legislature, as Kansas grapples with the complex issue of gender-affirming care for minors. The outcome of the potential veto override could have far-reaching implications not only for the state but for the wider national conversation on transgender rights and healthcare.