Judge Dismisses Classified Documents Case Against Former President Trump Over Appointments Clause Violation

ICARO Media Group
Politics
15/07/2024 17h11

In a significant development, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has dismissed the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump. The order, issued on Monday morning, cited the violation of the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution in the appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith. Judge Cannon was appointed to the bench by the former president.

The dismissal comes as a blow to Special Counsel Jack Smith, who had contested the argument that his appointment violated the constitution. Other federal courts had previously upheld the constitutionality of special counsels. However, Judge Cannon found that none of the statutes cited as legal authority for Smith's appointment granted the Attorney General the power to appoint a federal officer with the kind of prosecutorial power wielded by Special Counsel Smith.

Judge Cannon's opinion aligned closely with the reasoning outlined by conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in a recent concurrence in a separate case against Trump. This decision has the potential to have wider implications on future appointments of special counsels and their authority.

Former President Trump welcomed the dismissal and took the opportunity to call for the dropping of all other cases against him, including the criminal charges related to his alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. In a statement on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump claimed that the dismissal of the "Lawless Indictment" in Florida should be the first step in uniting the nation. He also accused the Democrat Justice Department of coordinating political attacks against him, asserting that they amounted to an election interference conspiracy against his political opponent, Joe Biden.

Trump's legal team on the case declined to comment further, while the Justice Department had no immediate comment on the dismissal of the case. The impact of this dismissal on the other ongoing cases against the former president remains to be seen.

This development highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding the Trump administration and raises questions about presidential appointments and the powers of special counsels. As legal proceedings continue, the outcome of these cases could have far-reaching implications for the balance of power and accountability within the U.S. government.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related