In a heated discussion on the morning talk show "Morning Joe," former Vice President Joe expressed frustration and provided a scathing response to claims made by his Republican counterparts. This follows former President Trump's recent accusations blaming Democratic "rhetoric" for a recent assassination attempt. JD Vance, Trump's running mate, has also called for the left to "tone down the rhetoric." Despite these assertions, Democrats remain steadfast in denying any involvement in fueling violent rhetoric.

During the show's panel discussion, Joe vehemently denounced the claims made by Vance and Trump, referring to them as "gaslighting of the first order." He vehemently argued that Democrats have consistently condemned all forms of violence and have actively worked towards promoting unity and civility in the political discourse.

The panel further debated the implications of the blame-game surrounding rhetoric. Some asserted that it was an attempt to divert attention from other pressing issues facing the nation, while others expressed concerns over the dangerous precedent of implicating a specific political party based on rhetorical influence.

Joe and other Democratic panelists emphasized the importance of addressing the root causes of political polarization rather than engaging in divisive finger-pointing. They argued that addressing systemic issues, such as income inequality, racial injustice, and access to healthcare, can create an environment conducive to constructive political dialogue.

In response to Joe's impassioned remarks, Republicans on the panel defended their stance, claiming that certain Democratic figures have indeed employed provocative language and rhetoric that could contribute to a toxic political climate.

As the discussion drew to a close, the panel acknowledged the need for all political parties to exercise restraint in their rhetoric. They encouraged open and honest conversations that focus on finding common ground and working towards the betterment of the country.

With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, the debate surrounding rhetoric and its potential impact on national unity is expected to intensify. Both parties will have to navigate these discussions carefully to ensure a productive and respectful discourse that addresses the concerns of all Americans.

At this time, no concrete actions have been proposed to address the issue of rhetoric and its role in political polarization. However, the conversation sparked by Joe's rebuttal highlights the ongoing need for discussions on civility, responsibility, and the role of political leaders in shaping the national conversation.

The dialogue continues, as Democrats maintain their stance of having no involvement in fueling violent rhetoric, and Republicans push for a toning down of language on the left. As the nation grapples with numerous challenges, the debate over rhetoric adds another layer of complexity to an already tense political landscape.