Investigation Uncovers Discrepancies in DOGE's Reported Savings and Workforce Reductions

https://icaro.icaromediagroup.com/system/images/photos/16535838/original/open-uri20250531-18-muw8wu?1748727348
ICARO Media Group
Politics
31/05/2025 21h19

### Controversy Surrounds DOGE's Claimed Savings Amid Workforce Reductions

The department led by Elon Musk asserts it has achieved an estimated $175 billion in savings through measures such as workforce reductions, cancellation of grants, and termination of contracts. Additionally, the department states that these efforts have saved individual taxpayers approximately $1,086 each. However, these claims have sparked substantial controversy due to numerous inconsistencies and errors detailed in multiple reports, which suggest that the actual savings may be significantly lower than reported.

One notable example of these discrepancies involves DOGE's claim of saving $8 billion by canceling an immigration contract, when in reality, the contract had a value of only $8 million. A BBC analysis conducted in April found that only around half of the savings itemized by DOGE could be verified with receipts or other evidence. Furthermore, some receipts are listed as "unavailable for legal reasons," raising further questions about the validity of the reported savings.

Before Donald Trump was elected and took office, Musk committed to reducing federal spending by $2 trillion, a figure that has since been revised down to $1 trillion. Several of the cuts directed by DOGE have faced significant opposition, especially the federal layoffs. In March, approximately 216,000 federal employees were laid off, as reported by Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The layoffs have affected numerous agencies, including the Department of Human Services, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Education, among others.

The legality of these layoffs has been contested in court, reaching as high as the Supreme Court. Just last month, the Supreme Court blocked a judge's order demanding the rehiring of employees from six federal agencies. The ongoing legal battles indicate that the controversy surrounding the department's reported savings and workforce reductions is far from resolved.

The views expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of ICARO, or any of its affiliates.

Related